Cited by 2Behavioral and Psychological StudiesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation Discipline and Inequality

‘I don’t know how to properly deal with challenging and complex behaviour’: initial teacher education for pre-service teachers on behaviour management

Open access
Porta, Tom, Hudson, Christopher·2025·Cogent Education

Abstract

The education sector in Australia is in crisis, struggling to retain teachers in the profession, with dealing with challenging and complex behaviour a major concern for new teachers. Previous research has shown that Functional Behaviour Assessment (FBA) can assist teachers in managing complex and challenging behaviours in the classroom, however, FBA is not always employed or conducted effectively. This research employed a mixed methods approach through a pre- and post- survey to measure pre-service teachers’ perceived self-efficacy in managing complex behaviours. This was after participating in a third-year undergraduate course focusing on curriculum regarding functional behaviour and positive behaviour support. This new course was designed to offer multiple means of engagement and opportunity to develop self-efficacy in the course curriculum, including case studies, podcasts, activities, critical reflections, and role-plays, as a result of the recommendations from the recent Teacher Education Expert Panel Report (TEEP). Findings indicated that participants perceived self-efficacy were higher for managing complex and challenging behaviours in the classroom after undertaking this course. Implications for future practice are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/2331186x.2025.2464339

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Addressing behavioural issues during WIL placement is an unpredictable and emotionally charged task, embedded within the complexities of evolving human relationships.

    “Addressing behavioural issues during WIL placement is an unpredictable and emotionally charged task, embedded within the complexities of evolving human relationships, as suggested by Porta and Hudson (2025).”

    From Mentorship in the Age of Generative AI: ChatGPT to Support Self-Regulated Learning of Pre-Service Teachers Before and During Placements (2025) · cites this paper as Porta and Hudson (2025)

    In ‘Ways of working with others’ (page unavailable), participants describe worries about managing behaviour while maintaining relationships with students; ‘Concerns for oneself’ also reports fears about its effect on mental health. These passages support the relational and emotional aspects, but the paper’s findings concern a behaviour-management course and role-play activities, not specifically behavioural issues during WIL placements. They also do not explicitly characterise that placement work as unpredictable. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide to understanding and doing. Sage Publications Ltd.
  2. Hudson, C. (2024). Leading positive classrooms: Adopting an educative approach to behaviour management in schools. Amba Press.
  3. Konza, D. (2001). Classroom management: A survival guide. In J. Grainger & K. A. Bradshaw (Eds.), Social Science Press.
  4. Waley, T. (2022). How can we tackle the teacher shortage?: Let's focus on retention . Independence, 47(2), 22-23. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.662023801240164 · DOI

Authors
Porta, T., & Hudson, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Federation University (AU)
Corresponding author
Porta, Tom
Venue
Cogent Education
Published
2025-02-12
Volume
12
Issue
1
ISSN
2331-186X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407392778
Cited by
2
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
behavioral problems, complex behavior, behavior management, pre-service teachers, teacher professional development, self-efficacy, positive behavior support, teacher retention, curriculum development, role play, podcasts, case studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review