The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of voluntary workshop attendance on academic performance and overall student satisfaction: a study among commissioned and university-enrolled dental hygienist students
Open accessAbstract
At Karolinska Institutet, we offer a specialized microbiology course designed for commissioned and university enrolled dental hygienist students. Given the diverse demographics—varying in age, backgrounds, study habits, self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation—we adopted a student-centered approach to enhance engagement. Our study aimed to explore the relationship between workshop attendance and academic performance. To evaluate this, we employed an extensive course evaluation form to gauge student satisfaction with the course format. Simultaneously, academic success was assessed through written summative in-class examinations. The results were striking: workshop attendees achieved significantly higher median scores (p < 0.001) compared to non-attendees. Furthermore, the number of students passing with distinction was notably greater in the group that actively participated in workshops (p < 0.05). Feedback from students reinforced the effectiveness of our approach. Most appreciated the course, and those attending workshops found this learning model particularly beneficial. The inclusion of workshops not only improved academic outcomes but also indicated a deeper level of engagement. Notably, combining digital tools with workshops emerged as a promising strategy for fostering student-centered learning, especially within heterogeneous student populations. In summary, our findings underscore the importance of tailored approaches to accommodate diverse learners, emphasizing the value of active participation and blended learning methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This interpretation is consistent with prior research showing that voluntary engagement with educational support activities is associated with both academic performance and student satisfaction, and that opting out of optional resources does not necessarily reflect disengagement but may represent deliberate self-regulated learning choices (Curbo and Hultgren, 2025).”
From Choosing not to use generative AI in higher education: a mixed methods study of student reasoning, assessment design, and AI literacy (2026) · cites this paper as Curbo and Hultgren, 2025
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y · Cited by 158 · cited 1×
“An enhanced academic performance is achieved when applying a more student-activating approach (Contrino et al., 2024; Holm & Beckman, 2022).”
Kang, H. Y., & Kim, H. R. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02508-y · Cited by 143
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1186/s41239-020-0177-7 · DOI
- 10.1152/advan.00072.2016 · DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.23657 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0297508 · DOI
- 10.2307/2112497 · DOI
- 10.1080/0268051022000048228 · DOI
- 10.1128/jmbe.00193-24 · DOI
- 10.1187/cbe.17-12-0283 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12909-022-03873-y · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1187/cbe.19-03-0067 · DOI
- 10.1187/cbe.17-11-0239 · DOI
- 10.1515/ijnes-2021-0119 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00102.x · DOI
- 10.1187/05-06-0082 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1207/S15328015TLM1301_8 · DOI
- 10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1187/cbe.09-01-0002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.02.010 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.307.6914.1264 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10872981.2020.1742964 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lindkvist, A., Curbo, S., & Hultgren, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1813306 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Curbo, S., & Hultgren, C.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Hultgren, Catharina
- Venue
- Cogent Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2331-186X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409045032
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cogent Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- dental hygiene education, microbiology course, workshop attendance, academic performance, student satisfaction, student-centered learning, blended learning, digital learning tools, heterogeneous student populations, self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, course evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of voluntary workshop attendance on academic performance and overall student satisfaction: a study among commissioned and university-enrolled dental hygienist students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2485526
- The paper
- Curbo, S., & Hultgren, C. (2025). Impact of voluntary workshop attendance on academic performance and overall student satisfaction: a study among commissioned and university-enrolled dental hygienist students. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2485526