The effect of online review and interaction on value co-creation in tourism virtual community
Open accessAbstract
User behavior in the tourism virtual community has become a hot research topic. Based on cognitive evaluation theory and organismic integration theory, this paper attempts to reveal the generation mechanism of user value co-creation behavior in tourism virtual community, which is of great significance for the operation and development of tourism industry. Altogether 342 valid questionnaires were collected in the survey, and structural equation modelling was employed to test the impact path. It was found that online reviews have two dimensions of characteristics, content and attributes. Online review characteristics positively influence the social interaction and information exchange dimensions of social interaction. Social interaction positively influences value co-creation behavior. The two dimensions of social interaction have a positive effect on user engagement, in turn, user engagement itself has a positive influence on recommendation behavior. Overall, the findings of the study can promote user participation in the interaction and information exchange behaviors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When the three psychological needs are met, they can guide positive results in various areas of life.
“When they are met, they can guide positive results in various areas of life [52,53,58].”
From What Influences Users’ Intention to Share Works in Designer-Driven User-Generated Content Communities? A Study Based on Self-Determination Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Section 2.3 (page unavailable) says that a supportive social context can meet basic needs and sustain internal motivation, and links internalized motivation to value co-creation in tourism virtual communities. It does not identify three psychological needs or say that meeting them leads to positive results across various areas of life. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 79 · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Xu, F., Bai, Y., & Li, S. (2020). Examining the antecedents of brand engagement of tourists based on the theory of value co-creation. Sustainability, 12(5), 1958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051958 · DOI
- Authors
- Gu, Y., & Zhu, J.
- Affiliations
- Guilin University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Jianbin
- ORCID
- Zhu, Jianbin
- Venue
- Cogent Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-09-27
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2331-1886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4387138212
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cogent Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Social Science Fund of China (22XKS003)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Keywords
- online reviews, value co-creation, social interaction, user engagement, recommendation behavior, cognitive evaluation theory, organismic integration theory, information sharing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
