The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review
Open accessAbstract
Population growth and increase in food requirement is the global problem. It is inevitable to introduce new practices that help to increase agricultural productivity. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) has shown potentials to be a promising technique in the practice of sustainable agriculture. A group of natural soil microbial flora acquire dwelling in the rhizosphere and on the surface of the plant roots which impose beneficial effect on the overall well-being of the plant are categorized as PGPR. Researchers are actively involved in understanding plant growth promoting mechanics employed by PGPR. Broadly, these are divided into direct and indirect mechanics. Any mechanism that directly enhances plant growth either by providing nutrients or by producing growth regulators are portrayed as direct mechanics. Whereas, any mechanisms that protects plant from acquiring infections (biotic stress) or helps plant to grow healthily under environmental stresses (abiotic stress) are considered indirect mechanics. This review is focused to describe cogent mechanics employed by PGPR that assists plant to sustain healthy growth. Also, we emphasized on the PGPR-based products which have been commercially developed exploiting these mechanics of PGPR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 · Cited by 11,723
Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health
Fisher, M. C., Henk, D. A., Briggs, C. J., Brownstein, J. S., Madoff, L. C., McCraw, S. L., & Gurr, S. J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10947 · Cited by 3,310
Daniel, R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1160 · Cited by 862
Cited by
Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress
Hashem, A., Tabassum, B., & Fathi Abd_Allah, E. (2019) · Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004 · Cited by 962
Azospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation
Fukami, J., Cerezini, P., & Hungria, M. (2018) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-018-0608-1 · Cited by 624
Oleńska, E., Małek, W., Wójcik, M., Swiecicka, I., Thijs, S., & Vangronsveld, J. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140682 · Cited by 555
Rhizosphere microbial communities and heavy metals
Barra Caracciolo, A., & Terenzi, V. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9071462 · Cited by 234
Sharma, I., Sharma, S., Sharma, V., Singh, A. K., Sharma, A., Kumar, A., Singh, J., & Sharma, A. (2024) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142678 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Goswami, D., Thakker, J. N., & Dhandhukia, P. C.
- Venue
- Cogent Food & Agriculture
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-19
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2331-1932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2262303243
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23311932.2015.1127500
- The paper
- Goswami, D., Thakker, J. N., & Dhandhukia, P. C. (2016). Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. Cogent Food & Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.1127500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.