CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Construction Project Management and PerformancePublic-Private Partnership ProjectsWater Governance and Infrastructure

Enhancing water and sanitation project performance in a developing economy: Role of governance mechanisms and risk management practices

Open access
Tukamuhabwa, Benjamin R., Mutebi, Henry, Akandwanaho, Enoth, Kabagambe, Levi, Tumukunde, Ivan·2023·Cogent Business & Management
DOI 10.1080/23311975.2023.2263994
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between governance mechanisms, risk management practices and performance of water and sanitation projects in Uganda. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted with a sample of 66 water and sanitation projects in South-western Uganda. Data were collected using self-administered structured questionnaires and analyzed by using SmartPls Structural Equation modeling. The results revealed positive and significant relationships between the following pairs of variables: contractual governance and project performance, relational governance and risk management practices, and risk management practices and project performance. However, the hitherto hypothesized positive and significant relationships between relational governance and project performance, and contractual governance and risk management practices were not supported. Furthermore, it was established that risk management practices fully mediate in the relationship between relational governance and project performance, whereas they do not mediate between contractual governance and project performance. The fundamental contribution of this article to the project management literature is the confirmation that risk management practices act as mechanisms through which relational governance helps to maximize project performance in the context of water and sanitation projects in a developing country.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23311975.2023.2263994

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clear allocation rules for water rights, extraction limits, priority sectors, and emergency rationing reduce ambiguity and limit contestation during scarcity.

    “Clear allocation rules regarding water rights, extraction limits, priority sectors, and emergency rationing reduce ambiguity and limit contestation during scarcity (Tukamuhabwa et al., 2023).”

    From Climate Security, Water Governance, and Resilience How Climate-Induced Water Stress and Migration Challenge State Capacity (2026) · cites this paper as Tukamuhabwa et al., 2023

    Section 6.2, Practical implications (page not provided), recommends clear contractual obligations and contingency provisions for water and sanitation project contractors. It does not address rules for allocating scarce water or whether such rules reduce ambiguity and contestation. Searches for water rights, extraction limits, emergency rationing, and scarcity found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. Ahimbisibwe, A., & Nangoli, S. (2012). Project communi- cation, individual Commitment, social networks, and perceived project performance. Journal of African Business, 13(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15228916.2012.693436 · DOI
  2. Ahola, T., Ruuska, I., Artto, K., & Kujala, J. (2014). What is project governance and what are its origins?. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013. 09.005 · DOI
  3. Atkin, B., & Skimore, M. (2008). Editorial: Stakeholder management in construction. Construction Management & Economics, 26(6), 549-552. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01446190802142405 · DOI
  4. Bakker, K. D., Boonstra, A., & Wortmann, H. (2010). Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.07.002 · DOI
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-med- iator variable distinction in social pychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Strategic and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  6. Borgstein, E. H., Lamberts, R., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2018). Mapping failures in energy and environmental perfor- mance of buildings. Energy Buildings, 158, 476-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.038 · DOI
  7. Brahm, F., & Tarziján, J. (2015). Does complexity and prior interactions affect project procurement? Evidence from mining mega-projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1851-1862. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.08.005 · DOI
  8. Bstieler, L., & Hemmert, M. (2015). The effectiveness of relational and contractual governance in new pro- duct development collaborations: Evidence from Korea. Technovation, 45, 29-39. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.technovation.2015.07.003 · DOI
  9. Caniëls, M. C., & Gelderman, C. J. (2010). The safeguarding effect of governance mechanisms in inter-firm exchange: The decisive role of mutual opportunism. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00654.x · DOI
  10. Carbone, T., & Tippett, D. (2004). Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Engineering Management Journal, 16(4), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10429247.2004.11415263 · DOI
  11. Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., & Wu, T. (2006). Uncertainty, opportunism and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1058-1077. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798187 · DOI
  12. Carvalho, M., & Junior, R. (2015). Impact of risk manage- ment on project performance: The importance of soft skills. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543. 2014.919423 · DOI
  13. Crispim, J., Silva, H., & Rego, N. (2018). Project risk man- agement practices: The organizational maturity influence. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12(1), 187-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJMPB-10-2017-0122 · DOI
  14. De Man, A., & Roijakkers, N. (2009). Alliance governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. Long Range Planning, 42(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.lrp.2008.10.006 · DOI
  15. El Baz, J., & Salomé, R. (2020). Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains' resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijpe.2020.107972 · DOI
  16. Fernando, Y., Walters, T., Ismail, M., Seo, Y., & Kaimasu, M. (2018). Managing project success using project risk and green supply chain management: A survey of automotive industry. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), 332-365. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-01-2017-0007 · DOI
  17. Floricel, S., Michela, J. L., & Piperca, S. (2016). Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1360-1383. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.007 · DOI
  18. Franz, B., Leicht, R., Molenaar, K., & Messner, J. (2017). Impact of team integration and group cohesion on project delivery performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862. 0001219 · DOI
  19. Goo, J., Kishore, R., Rao, H. R., & Nam, K. (2009). The role of service level agreements in relational manage- ment of information technology outsourcing: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 119-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650281 · DOI
  20. Guo, F., Chang-Richards, Y., Wilkinson, S., & Li, C. (2014). Effects of project governance structures on the management of risks in major infrastructure projects: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 815-826. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.001 · DOI
  21. Gustavsson, T. K., & Hallin, A. (2014). Rethinking dichot- omization: A critical perspective on the use of 'hard' and 'soft' in project management research. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 568-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10. 009 · DOI
  22. Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLSSEM using confir- matory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2019.11.069 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Handley, S. M. (2017). How governance misalignment and outsourcing capability impact performance. Production and Operations Management, 26(1), 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12609 · DOI
  24. Haq, S., Gu, D., Liang, C., & Abdullah, I. (2019). Project governance mechanisms and the performance of software development projects: Moderating role of requirements risk. International Journal of Project Management, 37(4), 533-548. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.008 · DOI
  25. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criter- ion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hossain, L., & Wu, A. (2009). Communications network centrality correlates to organisational coordination. International Journal of Project Management, 27(8), 795-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.02. 003 · DOI
  27. Huber, T. L., Fischer, T. A., Dibbern, J., & Hirschheim, R. (2013). A process model of complementarity and substitution of contractual and relational governance in is outsourcing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 81-114. https://doi.org/10.2753/ MIS0742-1222300304 · DOI
  28. Hussein, B. A., Ahmad, S. B. S., & Zidane, Y. J. T. (2015). Problems associated with defining project success. Procedia computer science, 64, 940-947. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.611 · DOI
  29. Hwang, B., Ngo, J., & Her, P. (2020). Integrated digital delivery: Implementation status and project perfor- mance in the Singapore construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121396. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121396 · DOI
  30. Irfan, M., Khalid, A., Kaka Khel, H., Maqsoom, A., & Sherani, K. (2023). Impact of work-life balance with the role of organizational support and job burnout on project performance. Engineering, Construction & Architectural Management, 30(1), 154-171. https:// doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2021-0316 · DOI
  31. Jagtap, M., & Kamble, S. (2020). The effect of the client- contractor relationship on project performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3), 541-558. https://doi.org/10. 1108/IJPPM-05-2018-0205 · DOI
  32. Junior, R., & Carvalho, M. (2013). Understanding the impact of project risk management on project per- formance: An empirical study. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 8, 11-12. Special Issue ALTEC. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 27242013000300006 · DOI
  33. Jun, L., Qiuzhen, W., & Qingguo, M. (2011). The effects of project uncertainty and risk management on is development project performance: A vendor perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 923-933. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijproman.2010.11.002 · DOI
  34. Kadefors, A. (2004). Trust in project relationships-inside the black box. International Journal of Project Management, 22(3), 175-182. https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0263-7863(03)00031-0 · DOI
  35. Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., & Aouad, G. (2001). Performance management in construction: A conceptual framework. Construction Management & Economics, 19(1), 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01446190010003425 · DOI
  36. Khalfan, M. M. A., Mcdermott, P., & Swan, W. (2007). Building trust in construction projects. Supply Chain Management, 12(6), 385-391. https://doi.org/10. 1108/13598540710826308 · DOI
  37. Khattak, M., Iqbal, M., Ikramullah, M., & Raziq, M. (2021). The mechanism behind informational fairness and project performance relationship: Evidence from Pakistani construction organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(1), 151-178. https://doi.org/10. 1108/IJPPM-04-2019-0164 · DOI
  38. Kutsch, E., Denyer, D., Hall, M., & Lee-Kelley, E. (2013). Does risk matter? Disengagement from risk man- agement practices in information systems projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(6), 637-649. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012. · DOI
  39. Liu, S. (2016). How the user liaison's understanding of development processes moderates the effects of user-related and project management risks on IT project performance. Information & Management, 53, 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.09.004 · DOI
  40. Liu, Y., Luo, Y., & Liu, T. (2009). Governing buyer-supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 294-309. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.004 · DOI
  41. Lu, P., Cai, X., Wei, Z., Song, Y., & Wu, J. (2019). Quality management practices and inter-organizational pro- ject performance: Moderating effect of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Project Management, 37(6), 855-869. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.005 · DOI
  42. Lu, P., Guo, S., Quin, L., He, P., & Xu, X. (2015). The effec- tiveness of contractual and relational governances in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 212-222. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.004 · DOI
  43. Luo, Y., Liang, F., & Ma, Z. (2013). The effects of contrac- tual governance and relational governance on con- struction project performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Digital Content Technology & Its Applications, 7(8), 741-749. https://doi.org/10. 4156/jdcta.vol7.issue8.84 · DOI
  44. Maurya, D., & Srivastava, K. (2020). Relationship between governance mechanisms and contract performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJPPM-09-2018-0338 · DOI
  45. Müller, R., Zhai, L., & Wang, A. (2017). Governance and governmentality in projects: Profiles and relation- ships with success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 378-392. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.007 · DOI
  46. Odimabo, O., & Oduoza, C. (2018). Guidelines to aid pro- ject managers in conceptualising and implementing risk management in building projects. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 515-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.promfg.2018.10.091 · DOI
  47. Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanism. Management Science, 25(9), 833-848. https://doi.org/ 10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Pimchangthong, D., & Boonjing, V. (2017). Effects of risk management practice on the success of IT project. Procedia Engineering, 182, 579-586. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.158 · DOI
  49. PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (sixth ed.). Project Management Institute.
  50. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707-725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.249 · DOI
  51. Sabahi, M., & Mellat Parast, M. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurship orientation on project perfor- mance: A machine learning approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 107621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107621 · DOI
  52. Schoper, Y.-G., Wald, A., Ingason, H. T., & Fridgeirsson, T. V. (2018). Projectification in western economies: A comparative study of Germany, Norway and Iceland. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijproman.2017.07.008 · DOI
  53. Seabright, M. A., Levinthal, D. A., & Fichma, M. (1992). Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of inter-organizational relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 122-160. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/256475 · DOI
  54. Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez- Orejuela, A. (2020). Governance and performance in co-exploitation and co-exploration projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(5), 875-894. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2019-0067 · DOI
  55. Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Mbago, M., Mutebi, H., & Kyoshabire, M. (2023). Gender, family background, cynicism and ethical sensitivity of future procure- ment professionals in a developing country context: Evidence from Ugandan universities. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 39(1), 81-106. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2020-0167 · DOI
  56. Tukamuhabwa, B., Stevenson, M., & Busby, J. (2017). Supply chain resilience in a developing country con- text: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), 486-505. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-02-2017-0059 · DOI
  57. McGraw-Hill. UNICEF. (2019), "Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)" accessed on May 10th, 2021, from https://www.uni cef.org/wash
  58. Vahabi, A., Nasirzadeh, F., & Mills, A. (2020). Impact of project briefing clarity on construction project performance. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(13), 2504-2516. https://doi.org/10. 1080/15623599.2020.1802681 · DOI
  59. Wang, D., Fang, S., & Kaili, L. (2019). Dynamic changes of governance mechanisms in mega construction pro- jects in China: The mediating role of opportunism. Engineering, Construction & Architectural Management, 26(4), 723-735. https://doi.org/10. 1108/ECAM-03-2018-0137 · DOI
  60. Watabaji, M. D. (2014). Contractual and relational gov- ernances: Are they complementary or substitutable in the context of value chains. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 17-24. https://doi. org/10.7176/EJBM Water and environment sector performance report. (2020), Ministry of water and environment. The republic of Uganda · DOI
  61. Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law & Economics, 22(2), 233-261. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 466942 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Wu, G., Li, H., Wu, C., & Hu, Z. (2020). How different strengths of ties impact project performance in megaprojects: The mediating role of trust. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(4), 889-912. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJMPB-09-2019-0220 · DOI
  63. Wu, A., Wang, Z., & Chen, S. (2016). Impact of specific investments, governance mechanisms and behaviors on the performance of cooperative innovation projects. International Journal of Project Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2016.12.005 · DOI
  64. Wu, G., Zhao, X., Zuo, J., & Zillante, G. (2019). Effect of team diversity on project performance in construc- tion projects. Engineering, Construction and Archtectural Management, 26(3), 408-423.
  65. Young, R., Chen, W., Quazi, A., Parry, W., Wong, A., & Poon, S. (2019). The relationship between project governance mechanisms and project success: An international data set. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(7), 1496-1521. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2018-0212 · DOI
  66. Young, R., & Grant, J. (2015). Is strategy implemented by projects? Disturbing evidence in the state of NSW. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03. 010 · DOI
  67. Zaman, U., Jabbar, Z., Nawaz, S., & Abbas, M. (2019). Understanding the soft side of software projects: An empirical study on the interactive effects of social skills and political skills on complexity-performance relationship. International Journal of Project Management, 37 (3), 444-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2019.01.015 · DOI
  68. Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Tan, J., Jiang, G., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Effects of risks on the performance of business pro- cess outsourcing projects: The moderating roles of knowledge management capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 36(4), 627-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.02.002 · DOI
  69. Zhang, J., Raza, M., Khalid, P., Ramírez-Asís, H., & Ramírez- Asís, E. H. (2021). Impact of team knowledge management, problem solving competence, inter- personal conflicts, organizational trust on project performance, a mediating role of psychological capital. Annals of Operations Research, 326(S1), 41-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04334-3 · DOI
  70. Zwikael, O., & Smyrk, J. (2015). Project governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 852-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10. 012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Mutebi, H., Akandwanaho, E., Kabagambe, L., & Tumukunde, I.
Affiliations
Makerere University (UG)
Corresponding author
Tukamuhabwa, Benjamin R.
ORCID
Venue
Cogent Business & Management
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2023-09-28
Volume
10
Issue
3
ISSN
2331-1975 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1080/23311975.2023.2263994
OpenAlex
W4387123420
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Cogent Business & Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public-Private Partnership Projects
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
Keywords
water and sanitation projects, project performance, governance mechanisms, risk management practices, relational governance, contractual governance, mediation, developing countries, project management, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review