Cited by 97Efficiency Analysis Using DEAAgricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural economics and policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A stochastic frontier analysis of technical efficiency in smallholder maize production in Zimbabwe: The post-fast-track land reform outlook

Open access
Mango, Nelson, Makate, Clifton, Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamin, Siziba, Shephard, Lundy, Mark·2015·Cogent Economics & Finance

Abstract

This article analyses the technical efficiency of maize production in Zimbabwe’s smallholder farming communities following the fast-track land reform of the year 2000 with a view of highlighting key entry points for policy. Using a randomly selected sample of 522 smallholder maize producers, a stochastic frontier production model was applied, using a linearised Cobb–Douglas production function to determine the production elasticity coefficients of inputs, technical efficiency and the determinants of efficiency. The study finds that maize output responds positively to increases in inorganic fertilisers, seed quantity, the use of labour and the area planted. The technical efficiency analysis suggests that about 90% of farmers in the sample are between 60 and 75% efficient, with an average efficiency in the sample of 65%. The significant determinants of technical efficiency were the gender of the household head, household size, frequency of extension visits, farm size and the farming region. The results imply that the average efficiency of maize production could be improved by 35% through better use of existing resources and technology. The results highlight the need for government and private sector assistance in improving efficiency by promoting access to productive resources and ensuring better and more reliable agricultural extension services.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23322039.2015.1117189

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/13504850110048523 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0169-5150(92)90049-5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.07.013 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s11123-006-0025-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00552.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1467-8489.1996.tb00558.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Goldman, D. (2013). Technical efficiency of rice production in India: A study using stochastic frontier analysis to estimate technical efficiency and its determinants (Thesis for the Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy Capstone Project). Tufts University, Medford, MA.
  9. Government of Zimbabwe, 2002, Crops sector
  10. 10.1080/758540813 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF00156342 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/07350015.1991.10509853 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Llewelyn R. V., 1996, Agricultural Economics, 15, 113, 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1996.tb00425.x · DOI
  14. Mazvimavi, K., Ndlovu, P. V., An, H. & Murendo, C. (2012, August 18–24). Productivity and efficiency analysis of maize under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economics (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu.
  15. 10.2307/2525757 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00116-3 · DOI
  17. Mugandani R., 2012, African Crop Science Journal, 20, 361
  18. Narala A., 2010, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 23, 375
  19. Owens T., 2001, The impact of agricultural extension on farm production in resettlement areas of Zimbabwe
  20. 10.2307/1243234 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1994.tb00384.x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00037-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00054-8 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/000368400421011 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0169-5150(96)01192-9 · DOI
  26. Weir, S. (1999). The effects of education on farmer productivity in rural Ethiopia (Working Paper CSAE WPS99–7). Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), University of Oxford.
  27. Weir, S. & Knight, J. (2000). Education externalities in rural Ethiopia: Evidence from average and stochastic frontier production functions (Working Paper CSAE WPS/2000–04). Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), University of Oxford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mango, N., Makate, C., Hanyani-Mlambo, B., Siziba, S., & Lundy, M.
Affiliations
  • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (KE)
  • Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP 167, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CO)
Corresponding author
  • Mango, Nelson
  • Makate, Clifton
  • Siziba, Shephard
  • Lundy, Mark
Venue
Cogent Economics & Finance
Published
2015-11-26
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
2332-2039 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2175465718
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cogent Economics & Finance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
technical efficiency, fast track land reform, land reform, agricultural extension, mineral fertilizers, seed use, farm size, determinants of efficiency, gender of household head, Zimbabwe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review