The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A stochastic frontier analysis of technical efficiency in smallholder maize production in Zimbabwe: The post-fast-track land reform outlook
Open accessAbstract
This article analyses the technical efficiency of maize production in Zimbabwe’s smallholder farming communities following the fast-track land reform of the year 2000 with a view of highlighting key entry points for policy. Using a randomly selected sample of 522 smallholder maize producers, a stochastic frontier production model was applied, using a linearised Cobb–Douglas production function to determine the production elasticity coefficients of inputs, technical efficiency and the determinants of efficiency. The study finds that maize output responds positively to increases in inorganic fertilisers, seed quantity, the use of labour and the area planted. The technical efficiency analysis suggests that about 90% of farmers in the sample are between 60 and 75% efficient, with an average efficiency in the sample of 65%. The significant determinants of technical efficiency were the gender of the household head, household size, frequency of extension visits, farm size and the farming region. The results imply that the average efficiency of maize production could be improved by 35% through better use of existing resources and technology. The results highlight the need for government and private sector assistance in improving efficiency by promoting access to productive resources and ensuring better and more reliable agricultural extension services.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13504850110048523 · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-5150(92)90049-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.07.013 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11123-006-0025-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00552.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-8489.1996.tb00558.x · DOI · Paper page
- Goldman, D. (2013). Technical efficiency of rice production in India: A study using stochastic frontier analysis to estimate technical efficiency and its determinants (Thesis for the Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy Capstone Project). Tufts University, Medford, MA.
- Government of Zimbabwe, 2002, Crops sector
- 10.1080/758540813 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00156342 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07350015.1991.10509853 · DOI · Paper page
- Llewelyn R. V., 1996, Agricultural Economics, 15, 113, 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1996.tb00425.x · DOI
- Mazvimavi, K., Ndlovu, P. V., An, H. & Murendo, C. (2012, August 18–24). Productivity and efficiency analysis of maize under conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe. Paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economics (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu.
- 10.2307/2525757 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00116-3 · DOI
- Mugandani R., 2012, African Crop Science Journal, 20, 361
- Narala A., 2010, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 23, 375
- Owens T., 2001, The impact of agricultural extension on farm production in resettlement areas of Zimbabwe
- 10.2307/1243234 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1994.tb00384.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00037-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00054-8 · DOI
- 10.1080/000368400421011 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5150(96)01192-9 · DOI
- Weir, S. (1999). The effects of education on farmer productivity in rural Ethiopia (Working Paper CSAE WPS99–7). Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), University of Oxford.
- Weir, S. & Knight, J. (2000). Education externalities in rural Ethiopia: Evidence from average and stochastic frontier production functions (Working Paper CSAE WPS/2000–04). Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), University of Oxford.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Akinsulu, A. A. (2025) · Journal of Agriculture and Environment · doi:10.4314/jagrenv.v20i2.5
“The Cobb–Douglas form of the stochastic frontier production model was used to analyse the technical efficiency level of cassava farmers, in line with the studies of Mango et al. ( 2015), Memon et al .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Mango, N., Makate, C., Hanyani-Mlambo, B., Siziba, S., & Lundy, M.
- Affiliations
- International Center for Tropical Agriculture (KE)
- Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Zimbabwe, P.O. Box MP 167, Mt. Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
- University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
- International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CO)
- Corresponding author
- Mango, Nelson
- Makate, Clifton
- Siziba, Shephard
- Lundy, Mark
- Venue
- Cogent Economics & Finance
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-11-26
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2332-2039 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2175465718
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cogent Economics & Finance (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
- Keywords
- technical efficiency, fast track land reform, land reform, agricultural extension, mineral fertilizers, seed use, farm size, determinants of efficiency, gender of household head, Zimbabwe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review