Addressing chronic absenteeism in schools: A meta-analysis of evidence-based interventions.
Abstract
Research has demonstrated that regular school attendance is necessary for acceptable academic performance and the development of desirable social skills and behaviors. One in seven students in the United States struggles with chronic absenteeism, and 36 states use accountability metrics that are designed to assess attendance rates as part of school performance profiles. The current meta-analysis examined the effects of interventions and programs on student attendance outcomes in pre-K–12 public schools. Data were taken from 22 random and nonrandom controlled intervention studies published from 2000 to 2018. Between-group (weighted g = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14–0.36) and within-group (weighted g = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.32–1.76) research designs resulted in small effects on attendance outcomes. Interventions were coded across three categories: behavioral interventions, family–school partnerships, and academic interventions. All three intervention areas resulted in small effects (weighted g = 0.09–0.26). The confidence interval for family–school partnerships was the only one that included 0, which suggests the possibility of a zero effect for that variable. Results suggest that most practices implemented to improve student attendance are either understudied, lead to small effects, or both. Implications for practice and future research regarding attendance interventions are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contrasting perspectives help uncover potential disconnects that may explain ineffective practices.
“contrasting perspectives help uncover potential disconnects that may explain ineffective practices (Eklund et al., 2022).”
From Their voices matter: student and professional perspectives on overcoming school attendance problems in the context of social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties (2025) · cites this paper as Eklund et al., 2022
Cites
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 · Cited by 6,793 · see citing works
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fail-safe N (Orwin, 1983) was also computed to determine the potential effect of missing studies on estimates of effect for individual variables.”
MethodIndicated Truancy Interventions for Chronic Truant Students: A Campbell Systematic Review
Maynard, B. R., McCrea, K. T., Pigott, T. D., & Kelly, M. S. (2013) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731512457207 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., Teelucksingh, E., Boys, C., & Lemkuil, A. (2003) · Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) · doi:10.1207/s15327671espr0802_4 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The Severity of State Truancy Policies and Chronic Absenteeism
Conry, J. M., & Richards, M. P. (2018) · Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) · doi:10.1080/10824669.2018.1439752 · Cited by 37 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…have developed mandatory attendance policies to help address chronic absenteeism (e.g., students cannot miss 10% or more school days during an academic year), but compulsory school attendance policies had little to no impact on school attendance rates (Conry & Richards, 2018; Kim & Joo, 2011).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cipriano, C., Naples, L. H., Eveleigh, A., Cook, A., Funaro, M., Cassidy, C., McCarthy, M. F., & Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G. (2023) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543221094079 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Kearney, C. A. (2021) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-020-09591-0 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Kearney, C. A., & Childs, J. (2023) · Improving Schools · doi:10.1177/13654802231174986 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Enderle, C., Kreitz-Sandberg, S., Backlund, Å., Isaksson, J., Fredriksson, U., & Ricking, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1405395 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Chhikara, D. (2025) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2025.2484852 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Absenteeism has been linked to various negative student outcomes, including poor academic performance, increased juvenile delinquency, and higher dropout rates (Ehrlich et al., 2013; Eklund et al., 2020; Sheldon, 2007).”
Enderle, C., Kotschy, L., Ricking, H., & Kreitz-Sandberg, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1627098 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eklund, K., Burns, M. K., Oyen, K., DeMarchena, S., & McCollom, E. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- University of South Dakota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eklund, Katie
- Venue
- School Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-09-24
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-111
- ISSN
- 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-966X
- OpenAlex
- W3088632600
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- School Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
- Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- chronic absenteeism, school attendance, attendance interventions, evidence-based interventions, behavioral interventions, school-family partnership, academic intervention, school accountability, intervention effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review