Cited by 17Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceEducational Assessment and ImprovementOnline Learning and Analytics

Translating sophisticated data analytic strategies regarding school attendance and absenteeism into targeted educational policy

Kearney, Christopher A., Childs, Joshua·2023·Improving Schools

Abstract

School attendance and absenteeism are critical targets of educational policies and practices that often depend heavily on aggregated attendance/absenteeism data. School attendance/absenteeism data in aggregated form, in addition to having suspect quality and utility, minimizes individual student variation, distorts detailed and multilevel modeling, and obscures underlying causes and disparities of absenteeism. Recent advances in data analytics/mining and modeling may assist researchers and other stakeholders by evaluating large-scale data sets in more targeted ways to identify key root causes and patterns of school absenteeism in a particular community, school, or group of students. This would allow for more accurate educational policies tailored to unique local conditions and student/family circumstances. This article provides a summary of recent algorithm- and model-based efforts in this regard. Algorithm-based efforts include classification and regression tree analysis, ensemble analysis, support vector machines, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and random forests. Model-based efforts include multilevel modeling, structural equation modeling, latent class analysis, and meta-analytic modeling. We then illustrate how these efforts can enhance a full and nuanced understanding of the root, interconnected causes of absenteeism, improve early warning systems, and assist multi-tiered systems of support interventions for absenteeism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13654802231174986

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conditions assessed at the aggregate level can mask within-district disparities, such that outcomes appearing adequate overall may be considerably worse for specific groups.

    “Kearney and Childs (2023) note that conditions assessed at the aggregate level can mask within-district disparities, such that outcomes appearing adequate overall may be considerably worse for specific groups.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kearney, C. A., & Childs, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Kearney, Christopher A.
Venue
Improving Schools
Published
2023-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
5-22
ISSN
  • 1365-4802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7583
OpenAlex
W4378229443
Cited by
17
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Improving Schools (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
school absenteeism, school attendance, education policy, data analytics, data mining, classification and regression trees, ensemble methods, support vector machine, random forest, multilevel modeling, latent class analysis, structural equation modeling, early warning systems, multi-tiered systems of support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review