Cited by 7Heat Transfer and OptimizationHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies

Variable geometry microchannel heat exchanger modeling under dry, wet, and partially wet surface conditions accounting for tube-to-tube heat conduction

Huang, Long, Bacellar, Daniel, Aute, Vikrant, Radermacher, Reinhard·2015·Science and Technology for the Built Environment

Abstract

Numerical models for microchannel heat exchangers are favored in the research and development process due to their cost effectiveness as opposed to prototype development and testing. A literature survey suggests that a unified air-to-surface heat and mass transfer modeling approach is lacking for microchannel heat exchangers, especially under dehumidifying conditions with tube-to-tube heat conduction. This research presents an air-to-fin heat and mass transfer model for a microchannel heat exchanger operating under dry, wet, and partially wet conditions. Typically, there are two boundary conditions for the fins in microchannel heat exchangers. The adiabatic fin tip boundary condition is applied to the extended fins on the top and bottom of the microchannel slab. The second boundary condition is the prescribed surface temperature, applicable to a fin bounded by two tubes. The proposed fin analysis method accounts for both boundary conditions and tube-to-tube conduction. The modeling approach is capable of locating the boundary between a dry and wet surface if a fin is partially wet. The model is verified against simulation results for air-to-surface heat transfer on a fin obtained using a commercially available computational fluid dynamics package. A new finite-volume microchannel heat exchanger model is developed using the proposed fin analysis method. The model is capable of predicting the performance of a variable geometry microchannel heat exchanger under both dry and dehumidifying conditions and is validated against experimental data. The average absolute capacity deviation between the predicted and measured values is 2.44% for condensers and 2.92% for evaporators. The absolute difference in sensible heat ratio for evaporators between predicted and measured values is 0.018. The proposed model allows for the most comprehensive and accurate analysis of microchannel evaporators and condensers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23744731.2015.1047717

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Huang, L., Bacellar, D., Aute, V., & Radermacher, R.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Aute, Vikrant
Venue
Science and Technology for the Built Environment
Published
2015-07-04
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
703-717
ISSN
  • 1078-9669 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-4731
  • 2374-474X
OpenAlex
W1530445704
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Science and Technology for the Built Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Keywords
microchannel heat exchangers, dehumidification, prescribed surface temperature, microchannel evaporator, microchannel condenser, sensible heat ratio, finite volume model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review