The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm
Abstract
A new mobilities paradigm emerged a decades or so ago in the context of significant theoretical shifts, methodological developments and novel research questions and approaches. We begin by considering what is meant by the idea of a “paradigm” from Thomas Kuhn. We then examine many ways in which this new paradigm transformed applied mobilities research over the past decade and how it might continue to reconfigure it. The new paradigm and three interconnected theoretical approaches are set out, before turning to assess the impact of the new paradigm upon emerging fields of social science by using various quantitative and qualitative measures. We examine the transformed ecology of this significant emergent field. Finally, the article explores the paradigm’s important relevance for applied research in urban transportation, climate change and energy transitions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
(2021) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132519898786 · Cited by 1,846
RetractedThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · Cited by 21,170
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a37268 · Cited by 5,591
Self-citationLehman, H. (1972) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/288419 · Cited by 2,998
Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition
Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203452202 · Cited by 2,585
Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change
Shove, E. (2010) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a42282 · Cited by 2,439
Urry, J. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,168
Self-citationEditorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings
Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450100500489189 · Cited by 2,039
Self-citation
Cited by
Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007 · Cited by 1,092
The roles of users in electric, shared and automated mobility transitions
Axsen, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.012 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheller, M., & Urry, J.
- Venue
- Applied Mobilities
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-25
- ISSN
- 2380-0127 (ISSN-L)
- 2380-0135
- OpenAlex
- W2332196696
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 59.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216
- The paper
- Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2016). Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
