The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organizations: A Review of the Research Literature
Abstract
E-mail is a communication network operating on a computer network that supports social networks. It combines locational flexibility, rapid transmission to multiple others across time and space, and the ability to store and process information. This chapter reviews research into how e-mail shapes—and is shaped by—organizational structures and processes. Although social phenomena strongly affect the use of e-mail, many discussions of media use have treated it as a voluntary, individual act of matching task to media. They have paid less attention to the influence of organizational power, group perceptions, and social network relations. E-mail provides fewer cues than face-to-face communication about interactions, physical context, or social roles. As this fosters status equalization, there is less awareness of group members’ expertise, organizational niche and power, and ascribed characteristics. Under certain conditions, people are more uninhibited, nonconformist, and conflictual when using e-mail; groups are more polarized and take longer to reach consensus. However, groups using e-mail tend to produce more diverse opinions and better contributions to the decision-making process. E-mail increases access to new people; weakens spatial, temporal, and status barriers; and provides access to information that would otherwise be unavailable. When people communicate electronically, work groups become more fluid. People can participate actively in more groups, and those on the periphery get more involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
Perrow, C. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091811 · Cited by 2,509
Cited by
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01462.x · Cited by 1,000
Computer Networks As Social Networks
Wellman, B. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065547 · Cited by 918
Self-citationStrong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media
Haythornthwaite, C. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290108195 · Cited by 747
Cui, G., Lockee, B., & Meng, C. (2013) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9192-1 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Garton, L., & Wellman, B.
- Venue
- Annals of the International Communication Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 434-453
- ISSN
- 2380-8977 (ISSN-L)
- 2380-8985
- OpenAlex
- W2488082054
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organizations: A Review of the Research Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/23808985.1995.11678923
- The paper
- Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995). Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organizations: A Review of the Research Literature. Annals of the International Communication Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1995.11678923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.