Cited by 69Colonialism, slavery, and tradeRace, History, and American SocietyHistorical Geography and Geographical Thought

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maroon Geographies

Winston, Celeste·2021·Annals of the American Association of Geographers

Abstract

This article synthesizes contributions of a growing body of geographic scholarship on marronage and presents a framework of maroon geographies to guide scholarship and political organizing centered on Black place- making and racial justice. I situate marronage-focused geographic scholarship within Black geographies literature that highlights the reverberations of transatlantic slavery in our current world order and historical and ongoing Black spatial acts of struggle and survival. Based on this scholarship and my own empirical research in Montgomery County, Maryland, I construct a framework of maroon geographies that encompasses physical sites of past flight from slavery as well as spaces produced through contemporary Black struggles. This framework comprises four main features: reworking geographic refuse, Black cooperative place- making, fugitive infrastructure, and a spatial strategy of entanglement. Maroon geographies offer a framework to explicitly address legacies of Black spatial epistemologies and practices that made possible freedom from slavery and that continue to shape sites of radical transformation and possibility. I conclude with a discussion of how the framework can inform scholarship and Black organizing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/24694452.2021.1894087

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Agorsah E. K., 1994, Maroon heritage: Archaeological, ethnographic, and historical perspectives
  2. Fly E. L., 1983, Northeastern Montgomery County Black oral history study
  3. Gilmore R. W., 2017, Futures of Black radicalism, 225
  4. Pathik, C. 1975. County Blacks: They came a long way.Montgomery Journal, April 17.
  5. Porter, P. 1988. Blacks try to preserve their land, heritage.Montgomery Journal, November 15.
  6. President’s Task Force on Urban Renewal., 1970, Urban renewal: One tool among many. The report of the President’s Task Force on Urban Renewal.
  7. Price R., 1976, The Guiana maroons: A historical and bibliographical introduction
  8. Quan H. L. T., 2017, Futures of Black radicalism, 173
  9. Roberts A. R., 2020, ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 19, 210
  10. Shore E., 2017, Afro-Hispanic Review, 36, 58
  11. Singh, J. 1981. Tobytown: A decade later.Montgomery Journal, February 13.
  12. Wright W. J., 2018, Antipode, 110, 1134
  13. Wynter S., 1970, Jamaica Journal, 4, 34

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Winston, C.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Winston, Celeste
Venue
Annals of the American Association of Geographers
Published
2021-05-04
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 2469-4452 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-4460
OpenAlex
W4205315503
Cited by
69
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
132.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the American Association of Geographers (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
Keywords
marronage, racial justice, transatlantic slavery, entanglement, Montgomery County, Maryland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review