The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In-situ monitoring of melt pool images for porosity prediction in directed energy deposition processes
Abstract
One major challenge of implementing Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Additive Manufacturing (AM) for production is the lack of understanding of its underlying process–structure–property relationship. Parts manufactured using the DED technologies may be too inconsistent and unreliable to meet the stringent requirements for many industrial applications. The objective of this research is to characterize the underlying thermo-physical dynamics of the DED process, captured by melt pool signals, and predict porosity during the build. Herein we propose a novel porosity prediction method based on the temperature distribution of the top surface of the melt pool as an AM part is being built. Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs) are then used to further analyze the two-dimensional melt pool image streams to identify similar and dissimilar melt pools. X-ray tomography is used to experimentally locate porosity within the Ti-6Al-4V thin-wall specimen, which is then compared with predicted porosity locations based on the melt pool analysis. Results show that the proposed method based on the temperature distribution of the melt pool is able to predict the location of porosity almost 96% of the time when the appropriate SOM model using a thermal profile is selected. Results are also compared with a previous study, that focuses only on the shape and size of the melt pool. We find that the incorporation of thermal distribution significantly improves the accuracy of porosity prediction. The significance of the proposed methodology based on the melt pool profiles is that this can lead the way toward in situ monitoring and minimize or even eliminate pores within the AM parts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Svetlizky, D., Das, M., Zheng, B., Vyatskikh, A. L., Bose, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., Schoenung, J. M., Lavernia, E. J., & Eliaz, N. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.020 · Cited by 1,371
Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Process: State of the Art
Ahn, D.-G. (2021) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology · doi:10.1007/s40684-020-00302-7 · Cited by 803
Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Meng, L., McWilliams, B., Jarosinski, W., Park, H.-Y., Jung, Y.-G., Lee, J., & Zhang, J. (2020) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-020-04155-y · Cited by 470
Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing
Qin, J., Hu, F., Liu, Y., Witherell, P., Wang, C. C. L., Rosen, D. W., Simpson, T. W., Lu, Y., & Tang, Q. (2022) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102691 · Cited by 391
Scime, L., & Beuth, J. (2019) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.010 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Khanzadeh, M., Chowdhury, S., Tschopp, M. A., Doude, H. R., Marufuzzaman, M., & Bian, L.
- Venue
- IISE Transactions
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-13
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 437-455
- ISSN
- 2472-5854 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5862
- OpenAlex
- W2772940940
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In-situ monitoring of melt pool images for porosity prediction in directed energy deposition processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/24725854.2017.1417656
- The paper
- Khanzadeh, M., Chowdhury, S., Tschopp, M. A., Doude, H. R., Marufuzzaman, M., & Bian, L. (2019). In-situ monitoring of melt pool images for porosity prediction in directed energy deposition processes. IISE Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2017.1417656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.