The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using machine learning to identify in-situ melt pool signatures indicative of flaw formation in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process
Abstract
Abstract Because many of the most important defects in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) occur at the size and timescales of the melt pool itself, the development of methodologies for monitoring the melt pool is critical. This works examines the possibility of in-situ detection of keyholing porosity and balling instabilities. Specifically, a visible-light high speed camera with a fixed field of view is used to study the morphology of L-PBF melt pools in the Inconel 718 material system. A scale-invariant description of melt pool morphology is constructed using Computer Vision techniques and unsupervised Machine Learning is used to differentiate between observed melt pools. By observing melt pools produced across process space, in-situ signatures are identified which may indicate flaws such as those observed ex-situ. This linkage of ex-situ and in-situ morphology enabled the use of supervised Machine Learning to classify melt pools observed (with the high speed camera) during fusion of non-bulk geometries such as overhangs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Object recognition from local scale-invariant features
Lowe, D. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410 · Cited by 16,472
Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 · Cited by 6,788
Visual categorization with bags of keypoints
Csurka, G. (2004) · Cited by 4,379
Khairallah, S. A., Anderson, A. T., Rubenchik, A., & King, W. E. (2016) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 · Cited by 2,766
Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing
Everton, S. K., Hirsch, M., Stravroulakis, P., Leach, R. K., & Clare, A. T. (2016) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 · Cited by 1,469
King, W. E., Anderson, A. T., Ferencz, R. M., Hodge, N. E., Kamath, C., Khairallah, S. A., & Rubenchik, A. M. (2015) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4937809 · Cited by 1,258
Gong, H., Rafi, K., Gu, H., Starr, T., & Stucker, B. (2014) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.002 · Cited by 1,038
Cited by
Machine Learning for industrial applications: A comprehensive literature review
Bertolini, M., Mezzogori, D., Neroni, M., & Zammori, F. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114820 · Cited by 553
Scientific, technological and economic issues in metal printing and their solutions
DebRoy, T., Mukherjee, T., Milewski, J. O., Elmer, J. W., Ribic, B., Blecher, J. J., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0408-2 · Cited by 543
Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing
Qin, J., Hu, F., Liu, Y., Witherell, P., Wang, C. C. L., Rosen, D. W., Simpson, T. W., Lu, Y., & Tang, Q. (2022) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102691 · Cited by 391
Machine Learning and Deep Learning in smart manufacturing: The Smart Grid paradigm
Kotsiopoulos, T., Sarigiannidis, P., Ioannidis, D., & Tzovaras, D. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100341 · Cited by 341
Progress and Opportunities for Machine Learning in Materials and Processes of Additive Manufacturing
Ng, W. L., Goh, G. L., Goh, G. D., Ten, J. S. J., & Yeong, W. Y. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202310006 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Scime, L., & Beuth, J.
- Venue
- Additive Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 25
- Pages
- 151-165
- ISSN
- 2214-7810 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-8604
- OpenAlex
- W2901057844
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 18.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using machine learning to identify in-situ melt pool signatures indicative of flaw formation in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.010
- The paper
- Scime, L., & Beuth, J. (2019). Using machine learning to identify in-situ melt pool signatures indicative of flaw formation in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
