Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Analysis of Secondary and Middle School Teachers’ Mathematical Problem Posing

Stickles, Paula R.·2011·Investigations in Mathematics Learning
DOI 10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Crespo S., 2003, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 243, 10.1023/A:1024364304664 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Goldenberg E., 2003, Teaching mathematics through problem solving, 55
  3. Goldin G., 1984, Task variables in mathematical problem solving
  4. Grundmeier, T. A. (2003).The effects of providing mathematical problem posing experiences for K-8 preservice teachers: Investigating teachers’ beliefs and characteristics of posed problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Hampshire.
  5. Huberman A. M., 1994, Handbook of qualitative research, 428
  6. Lesh R., 2003, Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching, 3, 10.4324/9781410607713 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Leung, S. (1993).The relation of mathematical knowledge and creative thinking to the mathematical problem posing of prospective school teachers on tasks differing in numerical information content. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
  8. Leung S., 1997, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9, 5, 10.1007/BF03217299 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lincoln Y., 1985, Naturalistic inquiry, 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Maki D., 2004, Introduction to mathematical modeling and computer simulation (preliminary edition)
  11. Marcus R., 2003, Teaching mathematics through problem solving, 55
  12. Mathematical Association of America, 1991, A call for change: Recommendations for the mathematical preparation of teachers of mathematics
  13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989, Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics
  14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1991, Professional standards for teaching mathematics
  15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1995, Assessment standards for school mathematics
  16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
  17. Polya G., 1945, How to solve it, 10.1515/9781400828678 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Silver E. A., 1979, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 195, 10.2307/748807 · DOI
  19. Silver E. A., 1994, For the Learning of Mathematics, 14, 19
  20. Silver E. A., 1996, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 293, 10.2307/749366 · doi:10.2307/749366
  21. Stickes P. R., 2006, Dissertation Abstracts International, 67, 2088

Cited by

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Stickles, P. R.
Affiliations
Millikin University
Venue
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2011-01
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
1-34
ISSN
  • 1947-7503
  • 2472-7466
DOI
10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301
Cited by
46
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Analysis of Secondary and Middle School Teachers’ Mathematical Problem Posing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301
The paper
Stickles, P. R. (2011). An Analysis of Secondary and Middle School Teachers’ Mathematical Problem Posing. Investigations in Mathematics Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.