Cited by 40Body Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Performance and TrainingPhysical Education and Training Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Body fat assessment in elite soccer players: cross-validation of different field methods

Suarez-Arrones, Luis, Petri, Cristian, Maldonado, Rafael Angel, Torreno, Nacho, Munguía-Izquierdo, Diego, Di Salvo, Valter, Méndez-Villanueva, Alberto·2018·Science and Medicine in Football

Abstract

Objective: In soccer players, body fat mass (FM) is commonly estimated by assessment methods such as skinfolds, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The main aim was to cross-validate the 3 field methods for quantifying body fat against a recent model of DXA. Methods: This study involved a group of 18 international-level, elite male soccer players belonging to the squad of a Serie A club in Italy. Results: All skinfold equations (with the exception of Deuremberg) showed large-to-very large positive correlations (r from 0.61 to 0.82, p ≤ 0.01) with DXA, however, BIA %FM data showed unclear relationship. All the sum of skinfolds showed moderate-to-very large positive correlations with DXA (r from 0.46 to 0.79, p values from 0.061 to 0.000). The combination of triceps and iliac crest skinfolds selected by the stepwise procedure explained 78.6% variance in DXA total %FM. Conclusion: All different methods employed in the present study are likely to differ, which prevent their use interchangeably. Almost all the equations showed positive correlations, but with different values in comparison with a recent model of DXA. Finally, the sum of skinfolds appears to be a good alternative when limited time and budged is available.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/24733938.2018.1445871

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Devlin BL, 2017, J Strength Cond Res
  2. Faulkner JA, 1968, Physiology of swimming and diving
  3. Jeukendrup A, 2010, Sport nutrition: an introduction to energy production and performance. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics
  4. Nikolaidis P, 2012, Cent Eur J Med, 7, 783
  5. Rebelo A, 2013, Int J Sports Med Apr, 34, 312
  6. Yamada Y, 2017, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19, 14

Metadata

Authors
Suarez-Arrones, L., Petri, C., Maldonado, R. A., Torreno, N., Munguía-Izquierdo, D., Di Salvo, V., & Méndez-Villanueva, A.
Affiliations
  • Aspire Academy (QA)
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
  • Department of Sports and Computer Science, Section of Physical Education and Sports, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain
  • Football Performance & Science Department, Aspire Academy, Doha, Qatar
Corresponding author
Suarez-Arrones, Luis
Venue
Science and Medicine in Football
Published
2018-03-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
203-208
ISSN
  • 2473-3938 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-4446
OpenAlex
W2789751620
Cited by
40
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Science and Medicine in Football (publishedVersion)
Funders
Qatar Foundation (Grant Number NPRP 6-1526-3-363)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
fat mass, soccer players, skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, cross-validation, triceps skinfold thickness, elite athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review