Transnational repression: data advances, comparisons, and challenges
Open accessAbstract
Research on state repression generally focuses on what states do to populations within their own borders. However, recently scholars working at the intersection of comparative politics and international relations have begun to systematically analyse states repressing their populations outside their borders as part of their foreign policy. Variously called transnational repression, extraterritorial repression, or sometimes global authoritarianism, the focus is on the motives, methods, and effects of states extending repressive practices to their citizens abroad. Much of the research in this area has developed theories and findings using fieldwork and interview-based methods. Recently, however, multiple researchers and research groups have produced cross-national publicly available event data on transnational repression. This research note explains the main features of those datasets, including their scope, sources, structure, definitions, and strengths and limitations. In addition to descriptive introduction, it discusses the challenges associated with gathering data on transnational repression as well as suggestions for moving forward. The main aims are to introduce available data on transnational repression to researchers interested in working in this area and to highlight issues they may confront in gathering new data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent research shows the truly global dimension of TR, with dozens of states around the world involved as perpetrators of TR incidents.
“Recent research shows the truly global dimension of TR, with dozens of states around the world involved as perpetrators of TR incidents (Dukalskis 2021; Dukalskis et al., 2022; Lemon et al., 2022; Schenkkan and Linzer 2021).”
From The Long Arm and the Iron Fist: Authoritarian Crackdowns and Transnational Repression (2024) · cites this paper as Dukalskis et al., 2022
Gathering reliable data on transnational repression is difficult.
“Gathering reliable data on TR is difficult (see Dukalskis et al. 2022).”
From The Long Arm and the Iron Fist: Authoritarian Crackdowns and Transnational Repression (2024) · cites this paper as Dukalskis et al. 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Dukalskis, A., Furstenberg, S., Gorokhovskaia, Y., Heathershaw, J., Lemon, E., & Schenkkan, N.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
- Freedom House (US)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dukalskis, Alexander
- Venue
- Political Research Exchange
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-07-27
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2474-736X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4288034301
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 14.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Political Research Exchange (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Keywords
- transnational repression, state repression, event data, data availability, data limitations, foreign policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review