The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COVID-19: effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public
Open accessAbstract
In a crisis, almost-instant choices about who to trust or distrust could make a difference between life and death. Trust is necessary for cooperation, coordination, social order, and to reduce the need for coercive state imposition. During a pandemic, people need to trust experts to help them understand and respond to the problem, governments to coordinate policy instruments and make choices about levels of coercion, and citizens as they cooperate to minimize infection. We compare these general requirements with specific developments in the UK and US, identifying: the variable reliance by elected politicians on scientific experts, worrying levels of distrust in elected leaders, and a shift from a trust-based to more impositional forms of government action (with more variation in responses in the US). While trust is difficult to define and measure, these examples show that people miss it when it is gone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Ostrom, E. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807763 · Cited by 20,653
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · Cited by 10,274
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
DOES FAMILIARITY BREED TRUST? THE IMPLICATIONS OF REPEATED TIES FOR CONTRACTUAL CHOICE IN ALLIANCES.
Gulati, R. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256729 · Cited by 4,945
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163
(1986) · Research in Organizational Behavior · Cited by 3,434
Barber, B. (1983) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,800
Theories of the Policy Process
Rippner, J. A. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315728247-10 · Cited by 1,396
Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox
Sent, E. (2002) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.2002.11506464 · Cited by 1,090
Political Trust in a Cynical Age
Citrin, J., & Stoker, L. (2018) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050316-092550 · Cited by 819
The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy
Carpenter, D. (2002) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691214078 · Cited by 801
Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249596 · Cited by 744
Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia
Blair, R. A., Morse, B. S., & Tsai, L. L. (2017) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.016 · Cited by 614
COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives
Weible, C. M., Nohrstedt, D., Cairney, P., Carter, D. P., Anderson, D., Durnová, A. P., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., McConnell, A., & Stone, D. (2020) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4 · Cited by 602
Self-citationGoverning the Commons? Water and Power in Pakistan's Indus Basin
Jacoby, H. G., & Mansuri, G. (2018) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-8351 · Cited by 556
Devine, D., Gaskell, J., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2020) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/1478929920948684 · Cited by 535
Governing Institutional Complexity: The Ecology of Games Framework
Lubell, M. N. (2013) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12028 · Cited by 457
Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429494284-8 · Cited by 372
Thinking Globally, Acting Locally — The U.S. Response to Covid-19
Haffajee, R. L., & Mello, M. M. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2006740 · Cited by 278
The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents
Sabatier, P., Hunter, S. M., & McLaughlin, S. M. (1987) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591298704000306 · Cited by 274
Cairney, P., & Kwiatkowski, R. M. (2017) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0046-8 · Cited by 243
Self-citationIntroducing the Narrative Policy Framework
Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Shanahan, E. A. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137485861_1 · Cited by 191
Policy capacity and Singapore’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Woo, J. J. (2020) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1080/14494035.2020.1783789 · Cited by 160
Political Influence and Bureaucratic Autonomy
Yesilkagit, K., & van Thiel, S. (2008) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1007/s11115-008-0054-7 · Cited by 156
Will COVID-19 be evidence-based medicine’s nemesis?
Greenhalgh, T. (2020) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003266 · Cited by 153
Three Kinds of Anti‐Intellectualism: Rethinking Hofstadter*
Rigney, D. (1991) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.1991.tb00172.x · Cited by 153
Evans, J. H., & Hargittai, E. (2020) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023120947337 · Cited by 150
The role of conviction and narrative in decision-making under radical uncertainty
Tuckett, D., & Nikolic, M. (2017) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354317713158 · Cited by 147
“Listen to the People”: Public Deliberation About Social Distancing Measures in a Pandemic
Baum, N. M., Jacobson, P., & Goold, S. D. (2009) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265160903197531 · Cited by 132
Ingold, K. M., Fischer, M., & Cairney, P. (2016) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12173 · Cited by 131
Self-citationCoproduction during and after the COVID ‐19 Pandemic: Will It Last?
Steen, T. P. S., & Brandsen, T. (2020) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13258 · Cited by 127
Weible, C. M., Pattison, A., & Sabatier, P. (2010) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.005 · Cited by 126
The UK government’s COVID-19 policy: assessing evidence-informed policy analysis in real time
Cairney, P. (2020) · British Politics · doi:10.1057/s41293-020-00150-8 · Cited by 106
Self-citationNewton, K. (2020) · The Political Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1467-923x.12901 · Cited by 102
Lesson‐Drawing from New Zealand and Covid‐19: The Need for Anticipatory Policy Making
Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (2020) · The Political Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1467-923x.12893 · Cited by 95
Governments cannot just ‘follow the science’ on COVID-19
Stevens, A. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0894-x · Cited by 92
Bækkeskov, E. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12244 · Cited by 90
When to Release the Lockdown? A Wellbeing Framework for Analysing Costs and BenefitsPreprint
Layard, R., Clark, A. E., Jan-emmanuel De Neve, A., Krekel, C., Fancourt, D. E., Hey, N., & O’Donnell, G. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3590884 · Cited by 85
Assessing the South Korean Model of Emergency Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Kim, M.-H., Cho, W., Choi, H., & Hur, J.-Y. (2020) · Asian Studies Review · doi:10.1080/10357823.2020.1779658 · Cited by 55
The Erosion of Trust During a Global Pandemic and How Public Administrators Should Counter It
Deslatte, A. (2020) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074020941676 · Cited by 55
Practical prescriptions for governing fragmented governments
Swann, W. L., & Kim, S. Y. (2018) · Policy & Politics · doi:10.1332/030557318x15230058720979 · Cited by 45
Making a Crisis Out of a Drama: The Political Analysis of BSE Policy-Making in the UK
Forbes, I. (2004) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00483.x · Cited by 35
Intra-crisis learning and prospective policy transfer in the COVID-19 pandemic
Powell, M. A., & King–Hill, S. (2020) · International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy · doi:10.1108/ijssp-07-2020-0339 · Cited by 32
Sell, T. K., Boddie, C., McGinty, E. E., Pollack, K. M., Smith, K. C., Burke, T. A., & Rutkow, L. (2016) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.016 · Cited by 29
Ideology Affects Trust in Science Agencies During a Pandemic
Hamilton, L. C., & Safford, T. G. (2020) · doi:10.34051/p/2020.389 · Cited by 23
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Yesberg, J. A., Hobson, Z., Kyprianides, A., Pósch, K., & Solymosi, R. (2020) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 5
Separating behavioural science from the herd
Oliver, A. (2020) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Cairney P., 2020, Paul Cairney: Politics & Public Policy
- Cairney P., 2020, British Politics.
- Cairney P., 2019, The Role of Trust in Policymaking.” Paper to International Conference on Public Policy, Montreal, May
- 10.2139/ssrn.3562796 · DOI
- 10.1057/9781137485861.0006 · DOI
- Kahneman D., 2012, Thinking Fast and Slow.
- Kettl D. F., 2017, Can Governments Earn Our Trust?
- 10.2307/448385 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lockyer, B., Islam, S., Rahman, A., Dickerson, J., Pickett, K., Sheldon, T., Wright, J., McEachan, R., Sheard, L., & the Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid‐19 Scientific Advisory Group (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13240 · Cited by 281
Boin, A., McConnell, A., & Hart, P. ‘. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72680-5 · Cited by 269
A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: an expert consultation
Iftekhar, E. N., Priesemann, V., Balling, R., Bauer, S., Beutels, P., Valdez, A. C., Cuschieri, S., Czypionka, T., Dumpis, U., Glaab, E., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100185 · Cited by 132
The UK government’s COVID-19 policy: assessing evidence-informed policy analysis in real time
Cairney, P. (2020) · British Politics · doi:10.1057/s41293-020-00150-8 · Cited by 106
Self-citationPolicy styles and political trust in Europe’s national responses to the COVID-19 crisis
Zahariadis, N., Petridou, E., Exadaktylos, T., & Sparf, J. (2021) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2021.2019211 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Cairney, P., & Wellstead, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Michigan Technological University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cairney, Paul
- Venue
- Policy Design and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-10-26
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 2574-1292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3094281406
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 116.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Policy Design and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, public trust, trust in experts, trust in politicians, science-policy relations, government pandemic response, public cooperation, United Kingdom, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review