The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Breeding for Salinity Tolerance in Plants
Abstract
Accumulation of high levels of salts in the soil is characteristic of arid and semi-arid regions. Although different curative and management measures are being used to render salt-affected soils fit for agriculture, they are extremely expensive and do not provide permanent solutions to overcome the salinity problem. In contrast, a biotic approach for overcoming salinity stress has gained considerable recognition within the past few decades in view of the vast experimental evidence from what has happened in nature concerning the evolution of highly salt-tolerant ecotypes of different plant species, and also from the remarkable achievements that have been made in improveing different agronomic traits through artificial selection. Considerable improvements in salt tolerance of important crop species have been achieved in the past 2 decades using barley, rice, pearl millet, maize, sorghum, alfalfa, and many grass species. Such achievements relied solely on assessment of the phenotypic expression of the features involved. Knowledge of the underlying physiological mechanisms producing those salt-tolerant individuals was not clearly known. The present review highlights the relationships between different physiological/biochemical variables being recommended as selection criteria, and salt tolerance of different plant species. This paper also lists different sources of genetic variation for salt tolerance since it is evident that for successful improvement in a character there must be a great amount of genetic variation present in the gene pool of a species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance
Ashraf, M., & Foolad, M. R. (2007) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006 · Cited by 4,776
Self-citationPhotosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview
Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2013) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6 · Cited by 2,028
Self-citationSome important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants
Ashraf, M. (2004) · Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants · doi:10.1078/0367-2530-00165 · Cited by 842
Self-citationProtein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress
Chen, X., Ding, Y., Yang, Y., Song, C., Wang, B., Yang, S., Guo, Y., & Gong, Z. (2021) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.13061 · Cited by 608
Improving Salinity Tolerance in Cereals
Shahbaz, M., & Ashraf, M. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2013.758544 · Cited by 438
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashraf, M.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4253113720
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breeding for Salinity Tolerance in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/713608051
- The paper
- Ashraf, M. (1994). Breeding for Salinity Tolerance in Plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/713608051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.