Cited by 844Plant Stress Responses and ToleranceGenetics and Plant BreedingTurfgrass Adaptation and Management

Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants

Ashraf, Muhammad·2004·Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1078/0367-2530-00165

Cites

187 of 187 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CO2-exchange characteristics are an important indicator of plant growth because of their direct link to net productivity; the effect of any stress on photosynthesis can be stomatal, nonstomatal, or both, and the extent depends on species.

    “CO 2 -exchange characteristics have been regarded an important indicator of the growth of plants, because of their direct link to net productivity (Ashraf 2004, Piao et al. 2008).”

    From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Ashraf 2004

  • Salinity stress significantly affects both stomatal and nonstomatal regulation of photosynthesis; salt stress at the reproductive stage decreases net CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance in wheat genotypes; salt-induced osmotic stress reduces photosynthesis via decreased ATP production from impaired electron transport.

    “It is known that salinity stress, similarly to other abiotic stresses, can significantly affect both stomatal and nonstomatal regulation of photosynthesis (Ashraf 2004, Saibo et al. 2009).”

    From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Ashraf 2004

  • PN is considered one of the potential physiological selection criteria for stress tolerance.

    “Although genetic differences in photosynthetic capacity exist at intraspecific and interspecific levels, P N is considered as one of the potential, physiological, selection criteria for stress tolerance (Ashraf 2004).”

    From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Ashraf 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 193 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashraf, M.
Affiliations
University of Agriculture Faisalabad (PK)
Corresponding author
Ashraf, Muhammad
Venue
Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
199
Issue
5
Pages
361-376
ISSN
0367-2530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161450708
Cited by
842
References
193
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 43
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Flora (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
Keywords
salt tolerance, plant breeding, selection criteria, osmotic adjustment, photosynthesis, water relations, physiological parameters, crop improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review