Cited by 412Disability Rights and RepresentationQualitative Research Methods and EthicsInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research

BARNES, COLIN·2003·Disability & Society

Abstract

This paper provides a broad-based overview of the development of emancipa tory disability research in the UK since its emergence in 1992. Drawing on personal experience in the field, the author responds to several important considerations that need to be addressed before considering adopting this controversial perspective. The paper is divided into two main sections. The first part provides a concise introduction to the thinking that underpins the concept of emancipatory disability research. The second section discusses key elements of this approach including the problem of accountability, the social model of disability, choice of methods and, empowerment, dissemination and outcomes. The paper concludes by suggesting that whilst there has been considerable progress over the last decade the future of emancipatory disability research remains precarious.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713662197

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. BARNES C., 1993, Making our own choices
  2. BARNES C., 1997, Doing Disability Research
  3. BARNES C., 2000, Creating independent futures, Stage One Report
  4. BROWN S. C., 2001, Handbook of Disability Studies
  5. CLOUGH P., 1995, Making Difficulties
  6. CLOUGH P., 1998, Articulating with Difficulties
  7. 2000, Where have all the activists gone: part 1, Coalition: the Magazine of the Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People
  8. 2000, Where have all the activists gone: part 2, Coalition: the Magazine of the Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People
  9. DYSON A., 1998, Articulating with Difficulty
  10. FINKELSTElN V., 2002, Coalition: the Magazine of the Greater Coalition of Disabled People, 10
  11. GOFFMAN E., 1961, Asylums
  12. GOFFMAN E., 1968, Stigma
  13. GUBA E. G., 1990, The Paradigm Dialog
  14. HEVEY D., 1992, The Creatures Time Forgot
  15. HUNT P., 1981, Disability Challenge, 2, 37
  16. MERCER G., 2002, Disability Studies Today
  17. MILLER E. J., 1971, A Life Apart
  18. MOORE M., 1998, Researching Disability Issues
  19. MORGAN H., 2001, Creating Independent Futures: Stage Two Report
  20. MORRIS J., 1989, Able Lives
  21. OLIVER M., 1987, Polity and Planning, 5, 9
  22. OLIVER M., 1997, Doing Disability Research
  23. OLIVER M., 1999, Disability Discourse
  24. OLIVER M., 1992, Personal Assistance Schemes in Greenwich: an evaluation
  25. RIOUX M. H., 1994, Disability is Not Measles
  26. SHAKESPEARE T., 1996, Exploring the Divide: illness and disability
  27. SWAIN J., 1995, Research and the Construction of Special Educational Needs
  28. THOMAS P., 2002, Coalition: the Magazine of the Greater Manchester Coalition of Disabled People, 17
  29. THOMSON R. G., 1996, Freakery: culture spectacles of the extraordinary body
  30. WOOD P., 1981, International Classification of Impairment, Disability and Handicap
  31. ZARB G., 1994, Cashing in on Independence

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 412

Metadata

Authors
BARNES, C.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
BARNES, COLIN
Venue
Disability & Society
Published
2003-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
3-17
ISSN
  • 0267-4645 (ISSN-L)
  • 0968-7599
  • 1360-0508
OpenAlex
W1978426085
Cited by
406
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 21
FWCI
24.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Disability & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
disability research, social model of disability, researcher accountability, empowerment, research dissemination, research outcomes, research methodology, disability studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review