CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 144Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibition and Interference in Selective Attention: Some Tests of a Neural Network Model

Houghton, George, Tipper, Steven P., Weaver, Bruce, Shore, David I.·1996·Visual Cognition
DOI 10.1080/713756733
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We describe a neural network system that models selective action—that is, how an organism selectively responds to an object when other objects evoke competing responses. Performance of the model during simulations of various selective action situations reveals a number of interesting patterns of data. Specifically, the model shows a complex relationship between how much a distractor interferes with response to a target and how much inhibition is associated with the distractor. Subsequent experiments with human subjects reveal that the paradoxical behaviour of the model is also observed in human behaviour. We conclude that the similar performance characteristics of the model and human subjects in a variety of situations suggest that the model has captured some of the essential properties of mammalian selective action mechanisms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713756733

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Arbuthnott K. D., 1995, Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 14, 3
  2. Houghton G., 1990, Current research in natural language generation
  3. Houghton G., Psyche
  4. Houghton G., 1994, Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language
  5. Hull I., 1943, The Principles of Behavior
  6. Jackson S., 1994, Information processing models of basal ganglia
  7. Kane M. J., Psychology and Aging
  8. LaBerge D., 1991, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 65, 10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.65 · DOI
  9. Moore C., 1994, Memory & Cognition, 56, 133
  10. Pavlov I. P., 1927, Conditioned reflexes
  11. Steriade M., 1984, Dynamical aspects of neocortical function
  12. Tipper S. P., 1992, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891, 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.891 · DOI
  13. Tipper S. P., 1991, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 681, 10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.681 · DOI
  14. Treisman A., 1990, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459, 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.459 · DOI
  15. Valdes L. A., 1993, The relation of negative priming to interference

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 144

Related

Metadata

Authors
Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Shore, D. I.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Bangor University (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Visual Cognition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1996-06
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
119-164
ISSN
  • 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0716
DOI
10.1080/713756733
OpenAlex
W2079311980
Cited by
144
References
96
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Visual Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
selective attention, inhibition, distractor interference, neural network model, competing responses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review