The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An analysis of four missing data treatment methods for supervised learning
Open accessAbstract
One relevant problem in data quality is missing data. Despite the frequent occurrence and the relevance of the missing data problem, many machine learning algorithms handle missing data in a rather naive way. However, missing data treatment should be carefully treated, otherwise bias might be introduced into the knowledge induced. In this work, we analyze the use of the k-nearest neighbor as an imputation method. Imputation is a term that denotes a procedure that replaces the missing values in a data set with some plausible values. One advantage of this approach is that the missing data treatment is independent of the learning algorithm used. This allows the user to select the most suitable imputation method for each situation. Our analysis indicates that missing data imputation based on the k-nearest neighbor algorithm can outperform the internal methods used by C4.5 and CN2 to treat missing data, and can also outperform the mean or mode imputation method, which is a method broadly used to treat missing values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Cited by
Machine learning: a review of classification and combining techniques
Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I. D., & Pintelas, P. E. (2006) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-007-9052-3 · Cited by 1,582
Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?
Weng, S. F., Reps, J., Kai, J., Garibaldi, J. M., & Qureshi, N. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174944 · Cited by 1,346
A survey on missing data in machine learning
Emmanuel, T., Maupong, T., Mpoeleng, D., Semong, T., Mphago, B., & Tabona, O. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00516-9 · Cited by 1,067
Class Noise vs. Attribute Noise: A Quantitative Study
Zhu, X., & Wu, X. (2004) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-004-0751-8 · Cited by 893
Data preparation for data mining
Zhang, S., Zhang, C., & Yang, Q. (2003) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/713827180 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Batista, G. E. A. P. A., & Monard, M. C.
- Venue
- Applied Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 519-533
- ISSN
- 0883-9514 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-6545
- OpenAlex
- W1983479840
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An analysis of four missing data treatment methods for supervised learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/713827181
- The paper
- Batista, G. E. A. P. A., & Monard, M. C. (2003). An analysis of four missing data treatment methods for supervised learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1080/713827181
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.