The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frontal lobe functioning in boys with attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder
Abstract
Prior attempts to relate attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to frontal lobe dysfunction have yielded mixed results. The present study attempted to minimize several methodological problems that may have contributed to these inconsistencies. A relatively large sample of rigorously defined ADHD boys (n = 66) and controls (n = 64) at two different age levels were administered a battery of neuro‐psychological tests sensitive to frontal damage in adults. ADHD boys were inferior to controls on a Vigilance task, Stroop, FAS, Rey‐Osterrieth Complex Figure, and Porteus Mazes. The groups did not differ on Trail Making or on aspects of Wisconsin Card Sorting sensitive to cognitive flexibility. ADHD boys and controls were comparable on several control tasks. Both groups showed a developmental advance in skills implicating prefrontal cortex between ages 6 to 8 and ages 9 to 11, but the relative deficit of the ADHD children appeared stable during this period. It is suggested that a longitudinal study would assist the interpretation of resemblances and differences between ADHD boys and adults with known frontal lobe impairment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory
Mesulam, M. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410280502 · Cited by 2,684
Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0 · Cited by 1,457
The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions
Robinson, A. L., Heaton, R. K., Lehman, R. A., & Stilson, D. W. (1980) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.48.5.605 · Cited by 491
Cited by
Barkley, R. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.65 · Cited by 580
Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V., & Pennington, B. F. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.006 · Cited by 3,568
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150
Quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
Castellanos, F. X. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830070053009 · Cited by 1,183
Rubia, K., Overmeyer, S., Taylor, E., Brammer, M., Williams, S. C. R., Simmons, A., & Bullmore, E. T. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.6.891 · Cited by 1,010
Metadata
- Authors
- Grodzinsky, G. M., & Diamond, R.
- Venue
- Developmental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 427-445
- ISSN
- 1532-6942 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-5641
- OpenAlex
- W2072898238
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.