CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Do Teachers' Comments on Students' Papers Help

Dohrer, Gary·1991·College Teaching
DOI 10.1080/87567555.1991.9925485
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

(1991). Do Teachers' Comments on Students' Papers Help? College Teaching: Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 48-54.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/87567555.1991.9925485

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feedback that requires low-level thinking, such as corrections and exact edits marked on student essays by teachers, resulted in subsequent compliance by the students-that is, students made the changes without questioning them, even if it meant sacrificing the quality of work in other ways.

    “The feedback that requires low-level thinking, such as corrections and exact edits marked on student essays by teachers, resulted in subsequent compliance by the students—that is, students made the changes without questioning them, even if it meant sacrificing the quality of work in other ways (Dohrer, 1991).”

    From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Dohrer, 1991

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Dohrer, G.
Affiliations
Weber State University (US)
Corresponding author
Dohrer, Gary
Venue
College Teaching
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1991-04
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
48-54
ISSN
  • 1930-8299 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-7555
DOI
10.1080/87567555.1991.9925485
OpenAlex
W2062123396
Cited by
56
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
College Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
teacher feedback, student writing, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review