The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Immigration and Mental Health: Mexican Americans in the United States
Abstract
The Hispanic population in the United States continues to expand rapidly due primarily to a large flow of immigrants from Mexico. Historical observations of disadvantage in the immigrant population, when compared to the native population, had helped to shape prevailing theories on immigration and mental health. However, data emerging from new research on Mexican Americans have come to challenge the old idea that immigrants are necessarily disadvantaged. The goal of this article is to review these new studies critically, to draw conclusions concerning the relationship between immigration and psychopathology, and to offer potential explanations for the major findings. We review five recent large-scale studies that examined the prevalence of mental disorders among Mexican-born immigrants and U.S.-born Mexican Americans in the United States. Results of these studies are inconsistent with traditional tenets on the relationship among immigration, acculturation, and psychopathology. They show that Mexico-born immigrants, despite significant socioeconomic disadvantages, have better mental health profiles than do U.S.-born Mexican Americans. Possible explanations for the better mental health profile of Mexican immigrants include research artifacts such as selection bias, a protective effect of traditional family networks, and a lower set of expectations about what constitutes "success" in America. The elevated rates of psychopathology in U.S.-born Mexican Americans may be related to easier access to abused substances and an elevated frequency of substance abuse among the U.S.-born.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kessler, R. C. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950010008002 · Cited by 12,370
Higgins, E. T., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1985) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1985.3.1.51 · Cited by 721
Cited by
Acculturation: When Individuals and Groups of Different Cultural Backgrounds Meet
Sam, D. L., & Berry, J. W. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610373075 · Cited by 1,219
Considering context, place, and culture: the national Latino and Asian American study
Alegria, M., Takeuchi, D., Canino, G., Duan, N., Shrout, P., Meng, X., Vega, W., Zane, N., Vila, D., Woo, M., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.178 · Cited by 733
Self-citationMental Health of Immigrants and Refugees
Pumariega, A. J., Rothe, E., & Pumariega, J. B. (2005) · Community Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-005-6363-1 · Cited by 584
Constructs, measurements and models of acculturation and acculturative stress
Rudmin, F. (2009) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.12.001 · Cited by 555
Health of foreign-born people in the United States: A review
Argeseanu Cunningham, S., Ruben, J. D., & Venkat Narayan, K. M. (2008) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.12.002 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Escobar, J. I., Nervi, C. H., & Gara, M. A.
- Venue
- Harvard Review of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 64-72
- ISSN
- 1067-3229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032337899
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immigration and Mental Health: Mexican Americans in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/hrp_8.2.64
- The paper
- Escobar, J. I., Nervi, C. H., & Gara, M. A. (2000). Immigration and Mental Health: Mexican Americans in the United States. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1080/hrp_8.2.64
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.