Self-Concept Discrepancy Theory: A Psychological Model for Distinguishing among Different Aspects of Depression and Anxiety
Abstract
This study tested whether self-concept discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1983) provides a psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Nondepressed, slightly depressed, and moderately depressed undergraduates filled out a variety of standard questionnaires—the Beck Depression Inventory, Blatt Depressive Experiences Questionnaire, Emotions Questionnaire (measuring chronic rather than momentary affect), and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (Depression, Anxiety, Hostility, and Somatization subscales)—as well as the Selves Questionnaire, which was created to measure self-concept discrepancy. The Selves Questionnaire asked subjects to list up to 10 attributes associated with each of six different self-concepts. Each self-concept involved a particular domain of the self (i.e., the “actual” self, the “ideal” self, or the “ought” self) combined with a particular standpoint on that self (i.e., the subject's “own” standpoint or the standpoint of a significant “other”). To calculate the magnitude of discrepancy between any two self-concepts for a given subject, the attributes in each self-concept were compared to the attributes in the other self-concept, and the total number of attribute pairs that matched (i.e., synonyms) was subtracted from the total number of attribute pairs that mismatched (i.e., antonyms). Zero-order and partial correlations were then performed to examine the relation between various emotional symptoms and the different kinds of actual-ideal discrepancies and actual-ought discrepancies. As predicted, actual-ideal discrepancy was generally associated with dejection-related emotions and symptoms, whereas actual-ought discrepancy was generally associated with agitation—related emotions and symptoms. The implications of these findings for previous theories and measures of depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Low anxiety/N is marked by low arousal positive affect, whereas high anxiety/N is marked by high arousal negative affect.
“Low anxiety/N is marked by low arousal positive affect, whereas high anxiety/N is marked by high arousal negative affect (Higgins, Klein, & Strauman, 1985).”
From Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. (2015) · cites this paper as Higgins, Klein, & Strauman, 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baumeister, R. F. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.1.90 · Cited by 1,919 · see citing works
Self-Complexity and Affective Extremity: Don't Put All of Your Eggs in One Cognitive Basket
Linville, P. W. (1985) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1985.3.1.94 · Cited by 934 · see citing works
Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange.
Hermans, H. J. M. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.31 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Prejudice with and without compunction
Devine, P. G., Monteith, M. J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Elliot, A. J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.817 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
L2 SELVES, EMOTIONS, AND MOTIVATED BEHAVIORS
Teimouri, Y. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000243 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Jung, E., Hecht, M. L., & Wadsworth, B. C. (2007) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.04.001 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Oyserman, D., & James, L. (2011) · Handbook of Identity Theory and Research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_6 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
The Role of Discrepancy-Associated Affect in Prejudice Reduction
DEVINE, P. G., & MONTEITH, M. J. (1993) · Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-088579-7.50018-1 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
CHIN EVANS, P., & McCONNELL, A. R. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309030 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Relating self-discrepancy to self-esteem: The contribution of discrepancy beyond actual-self ratings
Moretti, M. M., & Tory Higgins, E. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90071-s · Cited by 208 · see citing works
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY FOR ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION
Brewin, C. R. (1996) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.33 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Kelly, R. E., Mansell, W., & Wood, A. M. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.011 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Magid, M., & Chan, L. (2012) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2011.614693 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Death anxiety in adult life—theoretical perspectives
Tomer, A. (1992) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481189208252594 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Regulatory focus and anxiety: a self-regulatory model of GAD-depression comorbidity
Klenk, M. M., Strauman, T. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.003 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationGebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Wagner, J., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000052 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Hardin, E. E., & Leong, F. T. L. (2005) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.25 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Lapadatu, I., & Morris, R. (2019) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2016.1272468 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The “self” in pain: The role of psychological inflexibility in chronic pain adjustment
Kwok, S. S. W., Chan, E. C. C., Chen, P. P., & Lo, B. C. Y. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9750-x · Cited by 24 · see citing works
When Being Discrepant From One’s Ideal or Ought Selves Hurts: The Moderating Role of Neuroticism
Hong, R. Y., Triyono, W., & Ong, P. S. (2013) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1888 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Higgins, E. T., Klein, R., & Strauman, T.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Social Cognition
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-76
- ISSN
- 0278-016X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067330009
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- depression, anxiety, dejection, agitation, self-esteem, emotional symptoms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
