Psychosocial correlates of problem gambling in Australian students
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the relationship between problem gambling and psychological and social adjustment in Australian adolescents. Method: A sample of 926 adolescents (mean age=14.46 years) in the Australian Capital Territory were administered a standardized series of measures relating to gambling and psychosocial adjustment. Young people were asked to indicate how often they gambled, to report any difficulties that they might have been experiencing with gambling, and to complete a variety of measures of psychosocial health, including: the GHQ-12, Rosenberg's self-esteem scale and other measures of social functioning. Results: The results were generally consistent with previous international studies. Those adolescents classified as problem gamblers were found to have poorer scores on all psychosocial measures. Although many in the problem gambling group reported being part of a socially active peer group, they also reported being more alienated and unpopular among their classmates. Conclusions: The results suggest that problem gambling appears to be a significant risk factor for poorer mental health among Australia adolescents. Given previous adult research indicating a link between early gambling and long-term gambling problems and poorer life outcomes (e.g. Abbott, McKenna and Giles, 2000 in New Zealand), these findings suggest a need to enhance existing educational initiatives and services specifically designed to assist adolescents with gambling problems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adolescents displaying gambling-related problems are at increased risk for alcohol or substance use.
“These findings are consistent with the cross-sectional literature that has also found that adolescents displaying gambling-related problems are at increased risk for alcohol or substance use (e.g.Delfabbro et al., 2006;Gupta & Derevensky, 1998;Hardoon & Derevensky, 2002;Jacobs, 2000;Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Rohde, Seeley, & Rohling, 2004;Nower et al., 2004;Stinchfield, 2000)”
From Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2017) · cites this paper as Delfabbro et al., 2006
Cross-sectional adolescent literature also has inconsistent findings for parent supervision and socio-economic status.
“These inconsistent findings are reflected in cross-sectional adolescent literature for both parent supervision (Chalmers & Willoughby, 2006;Magoon & Ingersoll, 2006;Vachon et al., 2004) and socio-economic status (Delfabbro et al., 2006;Molde, Pallesen, Bartone, Hystad, & Johnsen, 2009;Welte, Barnes, Tidwell, & Hoffman, 2008).”
From Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2017) · cites this paper as Delfabbro et al., 2006
The relationship between internalising symptoms and problem gambling, at least in adolescence and young adulthood, is not as strong as the cross-sectional literature would suggest.
“Taken together, these findings suggest that the relationship between internalising symptoms and problem gambling, at least in adolescence and young adulthood, is not as strong as the cross-sectional literature (Delfabbro et al., 2006;Dickson et al., 2008;Gupta & Derevensky, 1998;Jacobs, 2000;Langhinrichsen-Rohling et al., 2004) would suggest.”
From Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2017) · cites this paper as Delfabbro et al., 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Delfabbro, P., Lahn, J., & Grabosky, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Delfabbro, Paul
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6-7
- Pages
- 587-595
- ISSN
- 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1614
- OpenAlex
- W4234008601
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ACT Government
- Department of Education and Training
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- problem gambling, youth gambling, psychosocial adjustment, mental health, self-esteem, social functioning, peer alienation, peer popularity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Australia, Catchment Area, Health, Female, Gambling, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Leisure Activities, Male, Mass Screening, Mental Health Services, Peer Group, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Students, Prevalence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review