Cited by 28Infant Development and Preterm CareChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentInfant Health and Development

Sensory processing of infants born prematurely or with regulatory disorders

Wiener, Andrea Santman, Long, Toby, DeGangi, Georgia A., Battaile, Britta·1996·Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in sensory processing among normal full-term infants, full-term infants with a regulatory disorder, and prematurely born infants. The Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI), a 24-item test designed to measure sensory processing and reactivity in infants, was administered to 329 infants, ages 7 to 18 months. The subjects included 228 infants considered normal, 45 infants with regulatory disorders, and 56 infants born prematurely. The infants with regulatory disorders had problems with sleep and eating, high irritability and sever separation anxiety. Prematurely born infants or those with a regulatory disorder scored lower than the normal infants on the TSFI. Sensory processing disorders were seen at each age for infants with regulatory disorders and those born prematurely. Infants with regulatory disorders scored lower than the prematurely born infants at 7 to 9 months in adaptive-motor skills, at 7 to 9 and 10 to 1 months in visual-tactile integration, and at 7 to 9 months in overall sensory prcessing. In contrast, the infants born prematurely scored lower than infants with regulatory disorders at 10 to 12 months in ocular-motor control and at 13 to 18 months in responses to movement in space. The results suggest that differences in sensory processing of infants with regulatory disorders are evident when compared to children born prematurely.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/j006v16n04_01

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In preterm and late preterm infants, sensory differences range from modest to substantial when assessed by behavioral questionnaires or interactive sensory exams.

    “Sensory differences in preterm and late preterm (34–36 weeks of gestation) infants have been found to be modest to substantial, measured through both behavioral questionnaires and interactive sensory exams [11–13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiener, A. S., Long, T., DeGangi, G. A., & Battaile, B.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics
Published
1996-01
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0194-2638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3144
OpenAlex
W2008159732
Cited by
28
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
sensory processing, preterm infants, regulatory disorders, sensory processing disorders, irritability, separation anxiety, visual-tactile integration, oculomotor control, infant development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review