Cited by 366Poisoning and overdose treatmentsPlant-based Medicinal ResearchForeign Body Medical Cases

Position Paper: Single-Dose Activated Charcoal

Toxicology, American Academy of Clinical, Centres, European Association of Poisons, Toxicologists, Clinical·2005·Clinical Toxicology

Abstract

Single-dose activated charcoal therapy involves the oral administration or instillation by nasogastric tube of an aqueous preparation of activated charcoal after the ingestion of a poison. Volunteer studies demonstrate that the effectiveness of activated charcoal decreases with time. Data using at least 50 g of activated charcoal, showed a mean reduction in absorption of 47.3%, 40.07%, 16.5% and 21.13%, when activated charcoal was administered at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes and 180 minutes, respectively, after dosing. There are no satisfactorily designed clinical studies assessing benefit from single-dose activated charcoal to guide the use of this therapy. Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients. Based on volunteer studies, the administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of a poison (which is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) up to one hour previously. Although volunteer studies demonstrate that the reduction of drug absorption decreases to values of questionable clinical importance when charcoal is administered at times greater than one hour, the potential for benefit after one hour cannot be excluded. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves clinical outcome. Unless a patient has an intact or protected airway, the administration of charcoal is contraindicated. A review of the literature since the preparation of the 1997 Single-dose Activated Charcoal Position Statement revealed no new evidence that would require a revision of the conclusions of the Statement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/clt-200051867

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toxicology, A. A. O. C., Centres, E. A. O. P., & Toxicologists, C.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Clinical Toxicology
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
61-87
ISSN
  • 0009-9309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3650
OpenAlex
W2037476819
Cited by
366
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
21.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Plant-based Medicinal Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Foreign Body Medical Cases
Keywords
poisoning, time to administration, oral administration, nasogastric tube, charcoal adsorption, airway protection
MeSH terms
Contraindications, Adsorption, Animals, Antidotes, Charcoal, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Poisoning, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review