Position Paper: Single-Dose Activated Charcoal
Abstract
Single-dose activated charcoal therapy involves the oral administration or instillation by nasogastric tube of an aqueous preparation of activated charcoal after the ingestion of a poison. Volunteer studies demonstrate that the effectiveness of activated charcoal decreases with time. Data using at least 50 g of activated charcoal, showed a mean reduction in absorption of 47.3%, 40.07%, 16.5% and 21.13%, when activated charcoal was administered at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes and 180 minutes, respectively, after dosing. There are no satisfactorily designed clinical studies assessing benefit from single-dose activated charcoal to guide the use of this therapy. Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients. Based on volunteer studies, the administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of a poison (which is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) up to one hour previously. Although volunteer studies demonstrate that the reduction of drug absorption decreases to values of questionable clinical importance when charcoal is administered at times greater than one hour, the potential for benefit after one hour cannot be excluded. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves clinical outcome. Unless a patient has an intact or protected airway, the administration of charcoal is contraindicated. A review of the literature since the preparation of the 1997 Single-dose Activated Charcoal Position Statement revealed no new evidence that would require a revision of the conclusions of the Statement.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Buckley, N. A., Buckley, N., Whyte, I. M., O'Connell, D. L., & Dawson, A. H. (1999) · Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology · doi:10.1081/clt-100102452 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pesticide exposure in children
Roberts, J. R., Karr, C. J., COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, Paulson, J. A., Brock-Utne, A. C., Brumberg, H. L., Campbell, C. C., Lanphear, B. P., Osterhoudt, K. C., Sandel, M. T., et al. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2758 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Interventions for paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose
Chiew, A. L., Gluud, C., Brok, J., & Buckley, N. A. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003328.pub3 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
- Authors
- Toxicology, A. A. O. C., Centres, E. A. O. P., & Toxicologists, C.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-87
- ISSN
- 0009-9309 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3650
- OpenAlex
- W2037476819
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 21.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Plant-based Medicinal Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Foreign Body Medical Cases
- Keywords
- poisoning, time to administration, oral administration, nasogastric tube, charcoal adsorption, airway protection
- MeSH terms
- Contraindications, Adsorption, Animals, Antidotes, Charcoal, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Poisoning, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review