The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Role of Inadequate Health Literacy Skills in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is ideally suited for early detection strategies that are likely to improve survival rates. Screening with either a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or flexible sigmoidoscopy has been shown to identify precancerous polyps or cancers in early stages. However, persons with limited education and of lower socioeconomic status infrequently participate in screening programs in general and have very low rates of colorectal screening. Low literacy, which is common among persons with limited education and low income, may be an overlooked factor in understanding patients' decision making about colorectal cancer screening. This article provides information from focus groups about colorectal cancer screening, which we examine in the context of relevant literature on cancer screening and literacy. Using the health belief model, we examine the association between inadequate health literacy skills and low rates of colorectal cancer screening. The theoretical model also provides insights into strategies for improving knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs and screening rates for this challenging patient population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N., & Pignone, M. P. (2004) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x · Cited by 2,309
Health Literacy and Cancer Communication
Davis, T. C., Williams, M. V., Marin, E., Parker, R. M., & Glass, J. (2002) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.52.3.134 · Cited by 658
Self-citationLindau, S. T., Tomori, C., Lyons, T., Langseth, L., Bennett, C. L., & Garcia, P. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.122091 · Cited by 484
Self-citationMcCray, A. T. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1687 · Cited by 371
McLachlan, S.-A., Clements, A., & Austoker, J. (2012) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.010 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, T. C., Dolan, N. C., Ferreira, M. R., Tomori, C., Green, K. W., Sipler, A. M., & Bennett, C. L.
- Venue
- Cancer Investigation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-200
- ISSN
- 0735-7907 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4192
- OpenAlex
- W1964522661
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Inadequate Health Literacy Skills in Colorectal Cancer Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/cnv-100000154
- The paper
- Davis, T. C., Dolan, N. C., Ferreira, M. R., Tomori, C., Green, K. W., Sipler, A. M., & Bennett, C. L. (2001). The Role of Inadequate Health Literacy Skills in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1081/cnv-100000154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.