Cited by 30Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesIndustrial Gas Emission Control

Activated Carbon from Peach Stones Using Phosphoric Acid Activation at Medium Temperatures

Kim, Dong-Su·2004·Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A

Abstract

In the present study, the activation features of phosphoric acid have been investigated using waste peach stones as the raw material in the production of granular activated carbon. Thermogravimetry/differential thermal analysis was conducted to characterize the thermal behavior of peach stone and titration method was used to evaluate the adsorption capacity of the produced activated carbon. It was observed that the iodine value of the activated carbon increased with activation temperature. However, temperatures higher than 500 degrees C caused a thermal destruction, which resulted in the decrease of the adsorption capacity. Activation longer than 1.5 h at 500 degrees C resulted in thermal degradation of the porous structure of the activated carbon. The adsorption capacity was enhanced with increasing of amounts of phosphoric acid, however, excessive phosphoric acid caused a decrease in the iodine value. In addition, it was found that the carbon yields generally decreased with activation temperature and activation time. Scanning electron microscopy analysis was conducted to observe the changes in the poros structure of the activated carbon produced in different temperatures. Activation of carbon by phosphoric acid was found to be superior to that by CaCl2 and gas activation. The activated carbon produced from peach stone was applied as an adsorbent in the treatment of synthesized wastewater containing cadmium ion and its adsorption capacity was found to be as good as that of the commercial one.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/ese-120030333

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, D.-S.
Affiliations
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Dong-Su
Venue
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A
Published
2004-12-27
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
1301-1318
ISSN
  • 1093-4529 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4117
OpenAlex
W1984199703
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
Keywords
activated carbon, peach stones, phosphoric acid activation, granular activated carbon, fruit waste valorization, activation temperature, activation time, iodine value, adsorption capacity, porous structure, cadmium removal, wastewater treatment, adsorbents
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Carbon, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fruit, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Phosphoric Acids, Refuse Disposal, Temperature, Porosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review