Cited by 148Gender Diversity and InequalityPublic Policy and Administration ResearchCareer Development and Diversity

Ensuring Employment Equity: Are Federal Diversity Programs Making a Difference?

Naff, Katherine C., Kellough, J. Edward·2003·International Journal of Public Administration

Abstract

In the last two decades, many public sector agencies have instituted a wide array of “managing diversity” programs designed to remove barriers to the full participation of women and people of color. Meanwhile, agencies are also increasingly responding to pressure to develop measures to monitor performance of all of their programs. Yet there have been few efforts in place to measure the effectiveness of diversity management programs. This article argues that such an evaluation is essential, and offers a preliminary governmentwide estimation of the success federal agencies have had in breaking down these barriers. We found, for the most part, that there is little evidence that broad‐based diversity programs, nor any of their programmatic components, have created a more equitable work environment for women or people of color. We then examine the programs at two federal agencies with significant diversity efforts, in depth, and find again that the results have been mixed. While not meant to be the final word, we suggest that these findings can serve as the basis for generating greater discussion and analysis of these important, but under‐evaluated, programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/pad-120024399

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anti-bias training can activate rather than suppress bias.

    “They suggest that anti-bias training can activate rather than suppress bias (Kidder et al., 2004;Naff and Kellough, 2003;Rynes and Rosen, 1995;Sidanius et al., 2001).”

    From Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization (2017) · cites this paper as Naff and Kellough, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naff, K. C., & Kellough, J. E.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Naff, Katherine C.
Venue
International Journal of Public Administration
Published
2003-10
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
1307-1336
ISSN
  • 0190-0692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4265
OpenAlex
W2095346700
Cited by
148
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Public Administration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
employment equity, federal agencies, program evaluation, women in the workplace, people of color, workplace barriers, public sector employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review