Effect of medium composition and explant source on the distribution profiles selected micronutrients in mistletoe tissue cultures
Abstract
In order to study the pattern of in vitro accumulation of selected micronutrients in mistletoe (Viscum album L.) callus cultures, we inoculated leaf and stem explants on a Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with different combinations of plant growth regulators at various concentrations. The accumulation of manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and boron (B) in mistletoe callus cultures was significantly affected by both plant growth regulator (PGR) treatment and explant source, as well as their interaction. However, neither of these factors affected Fe accumulation in a statistically significant sense. The average concentration of iron (Fe), Mn, Zn, and Cu in vitro was higher in stem‐derived callus cultures than in leaf‐derived calli, and much higher than in mistletoe plants and in mistletoe hosts, such as fir, oak and chestnut. For stem‐derived calli and with the exception of B, application of 4.65 µM potassium (K) was superior to other PGR treatments leading to the maximum in vitro accumulation of the selected micronutrients. Except for B, the accumulation of micronutrients in stem‐derived callus cultures was highly correlated with dry weight concentration; a high positive correlation was also observed among Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu concentration, while B accumulation was slightly negatively correlated with the other micronutrients. On the contrary, in leaf‐derived cultures, a high positive correlation was observed only between Mn and Cu concentration. The concentrat…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Viscum album, in approximately 10% of 100 assayed calli, protein concentration was six-times higher than in donor stem tissues, but protein content and profiling were not identified.
“The authors assayed 100 individual callus tissues and, in approximately 10% of the calli, determined that the protein concentration was six-times higher than in the donor stem tissues. However, the protein content and its profiling were not identified [140].”
From Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants (2023) · cites this paper as [140]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants
Duta-Cornescu, G., Constantin, N., Pojoga, D.-M., Nicuta, D., & Simon-Gruita, A. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24010838 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“However, the protein content and its profiling were not identified [140].”
Background
- Authors
- Kintzios, S., Barberaki, M., Drossopoulos, J., Turgelis, P., & Konstas, J.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Barberaki, M.
- ORCID
- Kintzios, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Plant Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 369-397
- ISSN
- 0190-4167 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4087
- OpenAlex
- W1989165352
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Plant Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Growth and nutrition in plants
- Keywords
- mistletoe, Viscum album, micronutrient accumulation, callus culture, explant source, leaf-derived callus, plant growth regulators, potassium supplementation, vitamin C, manganese, zinc, copper, boron, iron, free phenolics, antioxidant defense, Murashige and Skoog medium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
