Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ACTINIDE PARTITIONING—A REVIEW

Mathur, J. N., Murali, M. S., Nash, K. L.·2001·Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange

Abstract

Reagents and methods that have been developed during the past 20 years for hydrometallurgical partitioning of actinides from different types of transuranium (TRU) wastes and dissolved fuels are reviewed. Emphasis is placed on the extraction performance of the fully-optimized reagents rather than on the structural iterations that were undertaken (and in some cases are still being conducted) to identify the optimum species. Particular attention is paid to separation processes that have been demonstrated in batch and counter-current solvent extraction, and batch and column mode extraction chromatography. The salient features of the various techniques and reagents for actinide recycle are compared. Sections of the review focus on neptunium behavior in hydrometallurgy and on characterization of those reagents best suited to the separation of trivalent actinides from fission product lanthanides. Selected flowsheets that have been reported for the separation and recovery of actinides from TRU wastes are presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/sei-100103276

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 528

Metadata

Authors
Mathur, J. N., Murali, M. S., & Nash, K. L.
Venue
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange
Published
2001-05-31
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
357-390
ISSN
  • 0736-6299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2262
OpenAlex
W2008150552
Cited by
528
References
0
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ACTINIDE PARTITIONING—A REVIEW. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/sei-100103276
The paper
Mathur, J. N., Murali, M. S., & Nash, K. L. (2001). ACTINIDE PARTITIONING—A REVIEW. Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1081/sei-100103276

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.