The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examination of the Potential of Ionic Liquids for Gas Separations
Abstract
:Ionic liquids have received increasing interest in recent years for “green” synthesis and separations because they have essentially no vapor pressure. We have begun an investigation of the potential of ionic liquids for gas separations, including the removal of carbon dioxide from stack gas generated in coal-fired power plants. In this paper, we report results from measurements of the permeance of nitrogen and carbon dioxide in supported ionic liquid membranes. Preliminary results for a porous alumina membrane saturated with l-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium bis[trinuoromethylsulfonyl] amide yielded a CO2 : N2 selectivity of 127. Using previously reported measurements of CO2 solubility in ionic liquids (1) and the measured membrane transport characteristics, a preliminary economic analysis of a separation process based on supported ionic liquid membranes has been performed. A comparison of cost estimates for this membrane-based separation to cost estimates reported for carbon dioxide removal using a conventional amine scrubbing operation shows that, with continued technology development, an ionic liquid membrane process may potentially be economically competitive with amine scrubbing. A preliminary cost estimate for an ionic liquid scrubber indicates that an ionic liquid absorption process shows less favorable economics than a supported ionic liquid membrane or an amine scrubber. However, results indicate that a more comprehensive technical and economic assessment is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Influence of chloride, water, and organic solvents on the physical properties of ionic liquids
Seddon, K. R., Stark, A., & Torres, M.-J. (2000) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac200072122275 · Cited by 2,293
Cited by
Measurement of SO2 Solubility in Ionic Liquids
Anderson, J. L., Dixon, J. K., Maginn, E. J., & Brennecke, J. F. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp063547u · Cited by 320
CO2 Capture from Dilute Gases as a Component of Modern Global Carbon Management
Jones, C. W. (2011) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114252 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Baltus, R. E., Counce, R. M., Culbertson, B. H., Luo, H., DePaoli, D. W., Dai, S., & Duckworth, D. C.
- Venue
- Separation Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 525-541
- ISSN
- 0149-6395 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5754
- OpenAlex
- W1972002419
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examination of the Potential of Ionic Liquids for Gas Separations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/ss-200042513
- The paper
- Baltus, R. E., Counce, R. M., Culbertson, B. H., Luo, H., DePaoli, D. W., Dai, S., & Duckworth, D. C. (2005). Examination of the Potential of Ionic Liquids for Gas Separations. Separation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1081/ss-200042513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.