Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examination of the Potential of Ionic Liquids for Gas Separations

Baltus, Ruth E., Counce, Robert M., Culbertson, Benjamin H., Luo, Huimin, DePaoli, David W., Dai, Sheng, Duckworth, Douglas C.·2005·Separation Science and Technology

Abstract

:Ionic liquids have received increasing interest in recent years for “green” synthesis and separations because they have essentially no vapor pressure. We have begun an investigation of the potential of ionic liquids for gas separations, including the removal of carbon dioxide from stack gas generated in coal-fired power plants. In this paper, we report results from measurements of the permeance of nitrogen and carbon dioxide in supported ionic liquid membranes. Preliminary results for a porous alumina membrane saturated with l-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium bis[trinuoromethylsulfonyl] amide yielded a CO2 : N2 selectivity of 127. Using previously reported measurements of CO2 solubility in ionic liquids (1) and the measured membrane transport characteristics, a preliminary economic analysis of a separation process based on supported ionic liquid membranes has been performed. A comparison of cost estimates for this membrane-based separation to cost estimates reported for carbon dioxide removal using a conventional amine scrubbing operation shows that, with continued technology development, an ionic liquid membrane process may potentially be economically competitive with amine scrubbing. A preliminary cost estimate for an ionic liquid scrubber indicates that an ionic liquid absorption process shows less favorable economics than a supported ionic liquid membrane or an amine scrubber. However, results indicate that a more comprehensive technical and economic assessment is warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/ss-200042513

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Baltus, R. E., Counce, R. M., Culbertson, B. H., Luo, H., DePaoli, D. W., Dai, S., & Duckworth, D. C.
Venue
Separation Science and Technology
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
40
Issue
1-3
Pages
525-541
ISSN
  • 0149-6395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5754
OpenAlex
W1972002419
Cited by
256
References
1
FWCI
26.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examination of the Potential of Ionic Liquids for Gas Separations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/ss-200042513
The paper
Baltus, R. E., Counce, R. M., Culbertson, B. H., Luo, H., DePaoli, D. W., Dai, S., & Duckworth, D. C. (2005). Examination of the Potential of Ionic Liquids for Gas Separations. Separation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1081/ss-200042513

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.