Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Room Temperature Ionic Liquids for Separating Organics from Produced Water

McFarlane, J., Ridenour, W. B., Luo, H., Hunt, R. D., DePaoli, D. W., Ren, R. X.·2005·Separation Science and Technology

Abstract

The distribution of polar organic compounds typical of water contaminants (organic acids, alcohols, and aromatic compounds) associated with oil and gas production was measured between water and nine hydrophobic, room‐temperature ionic liquids. The ionic liquids used in this study were 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium bistrifluoromethanesulfonylimide, 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimidazolium bistrifluoromethanesulfonylimide, 1‐octyl‐3‐methylimidazolium bistrifluoromethanesulfonylimide, 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium bistrifluoromethanesulfonylimide, 1‐butyl‐1‐methyl‐pyrrolidinium bistrifluoromethanesulfonylimide, trihexyltetradecylphosphonium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, tributyltetradecylphosphonium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, and trihexyltetradecylphosphonium methanesulfonate. Sensitivity of the distribution coefficients to salinity, temperature, concentration, and pH was investigated. Partitioning into the ionic liquid varied considerably. Acetic acid did not significantly partition into the ionic liquid phase, except for the sulfonate‐anion ionic liquids. The solubility of hexanoic acid in the ionic liquids was significant, where uptake of the protonated form from aqueous solution was observed for all of the ionic liquids studied. Other organics also showed high distribution coefficients, up to several hundred in the case of toluene and 1‐nonanol. The distribution coefficients for toluene, 1‐nonanol, cyclohexanone, and hexanoic acid were independent of ionic liquid‐to‐water ratio over the range from 0.02 to 1.0. The ionic liquids showed a large capacity for some organics, with solubilities measured above 100 g·L−1. Regeneration of the ionic liquids by rinsing and heating was studied, with mixed success. These experiments show that certain hydrophobic ionic liquids do have an affinity for organic contaminants in aqueous solution. However, practical application of the ionic liquids tested for detection or removal of selected water‐soluble organics from the aqueous waste streams appears to be limited by the small, but significant, solubility of the ionic liquids in the aqueous phase and by difficulty in solvent regeneration. Further work aimed at determination of ionic liquids that dissolve target compounds and are nonhazardous and less soluble in aqueous solutions is recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1081/ss-200052807

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
McFarlane, J., Ridenour, W. B., Luo, H., Hunt, R. D., DePaoli, D. W., & Ren, R. X.
Venue
Separation Science and Technology
Published
2005-04
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
1245-1265
ISSN
  • 0149-6395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5754
OpenAlex
W2044410057
Cited by
194
References
1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Room Temperature Ionic Liquids for Separating Organics from Produced Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1081/ss-200052807
The paper
McFarlane, J., Ridenour, W. B., Luo, H., Hunt, R. D., DePaoli, D. W., & Ren, R. X. (2005). Room Temperature Ionic Liquids for Separating Organics from Produced Water. Separation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1081/ss-200052807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.