The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Topological distribution of two connexin32 antigenic sites in intact and split rodent hepatocyte gap junctions.
Open accessAbstract
The membrane topology of connexin32, a principal polypeptide of gap junctions in diverse cell types, has been studied in rat and mouse hepatocyte gap junctions using site-specific antisera raised against synthetic oligopeptides corresponding to amino acid sequences deduced from cDNA clones. Based on published hydropathicity maps and identified protease-sensitive cleavage sites, oligopeptides were synthesized corresponding to two hydrophilic domains of connexin32, one predicted to face the cytoplasm, the other predicted to be directed extracellularly. Antisera were raised to keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugates of the oligopeptides and used to map the distribution of their antigens using indirect immunocytochemistry on isolated gap junctions. The results directly demonstrated the cytoplasmic orientation of an antigen contained within amino acids 98-124 of the connexin32 sequence. The extracellular space in intact, isolated gap junctions is too small to permit binding of antibody molecules, necessitating the experimental separation of the junctional membranes to expose their extracellular surfaces using a urea/alkali procedure. While an antigen contained within amino acids 164-189 was visualized on the extracellular surfaces of some of the separated junctional membranes, variability in the observations and in the splitting procedure left ambiguities concerning the biological relevance of the observations after the denaturing conditions necessary to separate the junctional membranes. Using a different approach, however, the antigen could be exposed in intact liver using a hypertonic disaccharide junction-splitting procedure. The period of time of antigen exposure at the cell surface appears to peak at 30 s and disappear by 2-4 min. Taken together, these data demonstrate the extracellular orientation of an antigen contained within amino acids 164-189, which may be involved in cell-cell interaction within the gap junction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Connections with Connexins: the Molecular Basis of Direct Intercellular Signaling
Bruzzone, R., White, T. W., & Paul, D. L. (1996) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0001q.x · Cited by 1,302
Self-citationConnexin family of gap junction proteins
Beyer, E. C., Paul, D. L., & Goodenough, D. A. (1990) · The Journal of Membrane Biology · doi:10.1007/bf01868459 · Cited by 542
Self-citationCotrina, M. L., Lin, J. H.-C., López-Garcı́a, J. C., Naus, C. C. G., & Nedergaard, M. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-08-02835.2000 · Cited by 388
Jongen, W. M., Fitzgerald, D. J., Asamoto, M., Piccoli, C., Slaga, T. J., Gros, D., Takeichi, M., & Yamasaki, H. (1991) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.114.3.545 · Cited by 364
Gap junctional communication and carcinogenesis
Yamasaki, H. (1990) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/11.7.1051 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodenough, D. A., Paul, D. L., & Jesaitis, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1988-11-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1817-1824
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2085154745
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topological distribution of two connexin32 antigenic sites in intact and split rodent hepatocyte gap junctions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.107.5.1817
- The paper
- Goodenough, D. A., Paul, D. L., & Jesaitis, L. (1988). Topological distribution of two connexin32 antigenic sites in intact and split rodent hepatocyte gap junctions. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.107.5.1817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.