The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells.
Open accessAbstract
Individual microtubule dynamics were observed in real time in primary cultures of newt lung epithelium using video-enhanced differential interference contrast microscopy and digital image processing. The linear filaments observed in cells corresponded to microtubules based on three criteria: (a) small particles translocated along them; (b) the majority of them disappeared after incubation in nocodazole; (c) and the distribution observed by differential interference contrast correlated with anti-tubulin immunofluorescence staining of the same cell. Microtubules were most clearly observed at the leading edge of cells located at the periphery of the epithelial sheet. Microtubules exhibited dynamic instability behavior: individual microtubules existed in persistent phases of elongation or rapid shortening. Microtubules elongated at a velocity of 7.2 micron/min +/- 0.3 SEM (n = 42) and rapidly shortened at a velocity of 17.3 micron/min +/- 0.7 SEM (n = 35). The transitions between elongation and rapid shortening occurred abruptly and stochastically with a transition frequency of 0.014 s-1 for catastrophe and 0.044 s-1 for rescue. Approximately 70% of the rapidly shortening microtubules were rescued and resumed elongation within the 35 x 35 micron microscopic field. A portion of the microtubule population appeared differentially stable and did not display any measurable elongation or shortening during 10-15-min observations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic instability of microtubule growth
Mitchison, T., & Kirschner, M. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/312237a0 · Cited by 3,337
Walker, R. A., O'Brien, E. T., Pryer, N. K., Soboeiro, M. F., Voter, W. A., Erickson, H. P., & Salmon, E. D. (1988) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437 · Cited by 980
Self-citation
Cited by
MICROTUBULE POLYMERIZATION DYNAMICS
Desai, A., & Mitchison, T. J. (1997) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83 · Cited by 2,563
Taxol Suppresses Dynamics of Individual Microtubules in Living Human Tumor Cells
Yvon, A.-M. C., Wadsworth, P., & Jordan, M. A. (1999) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.10.4.947 · Cited by 553
Microtubule dynamics and microtubule caps: a time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy study.
Mandelkow, E. M., Mandelkow, E., & Milligan, R. A. (1991) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.114.5.977 · Cited by 552
Force Generation by Microtubule Assembly/Disassembly in Mitosis and Related Movements
Inoué, S., & Salmon, E. D. (1995) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.6.12.1619 · Cited by 532
Self-citationKowalski, R. J., Giannakakou, P., & Hamel, E. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.4.2534 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Cassimeris, L., Pryer, N. K., & Salmon, E. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1988-12-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2223-2231
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2153128242
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.107.6.2223
- The paper
- Cassimeris, L., Pryer, N. K., & Salmon, E. D. (1988). Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.107.6.2223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.