The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape.
Open accessAbstract
Microtubules are long, proteinaceous filaments that perform structural functions in eukaryotic cells by defining cellular shape and serving as tracks for intracellular motor proteins. We report the first accurate measurements of the flexural rigidity of microtubules. By analyzing the thermally driven fluctuations in their shape, we estimated the mean flexural rigidity of taxol-stabilized microtubules to be 2.2 x 10(-23) Nm2 (with 6.4% uncertainty) for seven unlabeled microtubules and 2.1 x 10(-23) Nm2 (with 4.7% uncertainty) for eight rhodamine-labeled microtubules. These values are similar to earlier, less precise estimates of microtubule bending stiffness obtained by modeling flagellar motion. A similar analysis on seven rhodamine-phalloidin-labeled actin filaments gave a flexural rigidity of 7.3 x 10(-26) Nm2 (with 6% uncertainty), consistent with previously reported results. The flexural rigidity of these microtubules corresponds to a persistence length of 5,200 microns showing that a microtubule is rigid over cellular dimensions. By contrast, the persistence length of an actin filament is only approximately 17.7 microns, perhaps explaining why actin filaments within cells are usually cross-linked into bundles. The greater flexural rigidity of a microtubule compared to an actin filament mainly derives from the former's larger cross-section. If tubulin were homogeneous and isotropic, then the microtubule's Young's modulus would be approximately 1.2 GPa, similar to Plexiglas and rigid plastics. Microtubules are expected to be almost inextensible: the compliance of cells is due primarily to filament bending or sliding between filaments rather than the stretching of the filaments themselves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry
Svoboda, K., Schmidt, C. F., Schnapp, B. J., & Block, S. M. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/365721a0 · Cited by 1,910
Erickson, H. P. (2009) · Biological Procedures Online · doi:10.1007/s12575-009-9008-x · Cited by 1,571
Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks
Gardel, M. L., Shin, J. H., MacKintosh, F. C., Mahadevan, L., Matsudaira, P., & Weitz, D. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095087 · Cited by 1,256
The tubulin code and its role in controlling microtubule properties and functions
Janke, C., & Magiera, M. M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0214-3 · Cited by 956
Measurement of the Force-Velocity Relation for Growing Microtubules
Dogterom, M., & Yurke, B. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5339.856 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Gittes, F., Mickey, B., Nettleton, J., & Howard, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1993-02-15
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 923-934
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2149374899
- Cited by
- 1,817
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.120.4.923
- The paper
- Gittes, F., Mickey, B., Nettleton, J., & Howard, J. (1993). Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.120.4.923
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.