The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents.
Open accessAbstract
Microtubules are rigid polymers that contribute to the static mechanical properties of cells. Because microtubules are dynamic structures whose polymerization is regulated during changes in cell shape, we have asked whether the mechanical properties of microtubules might also be modulated. We measured the flexural rigidity, or bending stiffness, of individual microtubules under a number of different conditions that affect the stability of microtubules against depolymerization. The flexural rigidity of microtubules polymerized with the slowly hydrolyzable nucleotide analogue guanylyl-(alpha, beta)-methylene-diphosphonate was 62 +/- 9 x 10(-24) Nm2 (weighted mean +/- SEM); that of microtubules stabilized with tau protein was 34 +/- 3 x 10(-24) Nm2; and that of microtubules stabilized with the antimitotic drug taxol was 32 +/- 2 x 10(-24) Nm2. For comparison, microtubules that were capped to prevent depolymerization, but were not otherwise stabilized, had a flexural rigidity of 26 +/- 2 x 10(-24) Nm2. Decreasing the temperature from 37 degrees C to approximately 25 degrees C, a condition that makes microtubules less stable, decreased the stiffness of taxol-stabilized microtubules by one-third. We thus find that the more stable a microtubule, the higher its flexural rigidity. This raises the possibility that microtubule rigidity may be regulated in vivo. In addition, the high rigidity of an unstabilized, GDP-containing microtubule suggests that a large amount of energy could be stored as mechanical strain energy in the protein lattice for subsequent force generation during microtubule depolymerization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic instability of microtubule growth
Mitchison, T., & Kirschner, M. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/312237a0 · Cited by 3,337
Cleveland, D. W., Hwo, S.-Y., & Kirschner, M. W. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(77)90213-3 · Cited by 915 · cited 1×
“1 ixM (Butner and Kirschner, 1991), we expect that each microtubule's surface was saturated with tau (~1 tau per five tubulin dimers; Cleveland et al., 1977).”
Background
Cited by
Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes
Desai, A., Verma, S., Mitchison, T. J., & Walczak, C. E. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80960-5 · Cited by 708
Measurement of the Force-Velocity Relation for Growing Microtubules
Dogterom, M., & Yurke, B. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5339.856 · Cited by 579
Kinesin Takes One 8-nm Step for Each ATP That It Hydrolyzes
Coy, D. L., Wagenbach, M., & Howard, J. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.6.3667 · Cited by 390
Self-citationMAP2 and tau bind longitudinally along the outer ridges of microtubule protofilaments
Al-Bassam, J., Ozer, R. S., Safer, D., Halpain, S., & Milligan, R. A. (2002) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200201048 · Cited by 327
Insights into the mechanism of microtubule stabilization by Taxol
Xiao, H., Verdier-Pinard, P., Fernandez-Fuentes, N., Burd, B., Angeletti, R., Fiser, A., Horwitz, S. B., & Orr, G. A. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603704103 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Mickey, B., & Howard, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1995-08-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 909-917
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W1969245469
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.130.4.909
- The paper
- Mickey, B., & Howard, J. (1995). Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.130.4.909
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.