The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint.
Open accessAbstract
Some cells have a quality control checkpoint that can detect a single misattached chromosome and delay the onset of anaphase, thus allowing time for error correction. The mechanical error in attachment must somehow be linked to the chemical regulation of cell cycle progression. The 3F3 antibody detects phosphorylated kinetochore proteins that might serve as the required link (Gorbsky, G. J., and W. A. Ricketts. 1993. J. Cell Biol. 122:1311-1321). We show by direct micromanipulation experiments that tension alters the phosphorylation of kinetochore proteins. Tension, whether from a micromanipulation needle or from normal mitotic forces, causes dephosphorylation of the kinetochore proteins recognized by 3F3. If tension is absent, either naturally or as a result of chromosome detachment by micromanipulation, the proteins are phosphorylated. Equally direct experiments identify tension as the checkpoint signal: tension from a microneedle on a misattached chromosome leads to anaphase (Li, X., and R. B. Nicklas. 1995. Nature (Lond.). 373:630-632), and we show here that the absence of tension caused by detaching chromosomes from the spindle delays anaphase indefinitely. Thus, the absence of tension is linked to both kinetochore phosphorylation and delayed anaphase onset. We propose that the kinetochore protein dephosphorylation caused by tension is the all clear signal to the checkpoint. The evidence is circumstantial but rich. In any event, tension alters kinetochore chemistry. Very likely, tension affects chemistry directly, by altering the conformation of a tension-sensitive protein, which leads directly to dephosphorylation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs
Jordan, M. A., & Wilson, L. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1317 · Cited by 4,000
The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time
Musacchio, A., & Salmon, E. D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2163 · Cited by 2,227
Cell Cycle Checkpoints: Preventing an Identity Crisis
Elledge, S. J. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5293.1664 · Cited by 2,039
Kapoor, T. M., Mayer, T. U., Coughlin, M. L., & Mitchison, T. J. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.150.5.975 · Cited by 717
Microtubules and actin filaments: dynamic targets for cancer chemotherapy
Jordan, M. A., & Wilson, L. (1998) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80095-1 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicklas, R. B., Ward, S. C., & Gorbsky, G. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of cell biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1995-08-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 929-939
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2127315808
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.130.4.929
- The paper
- Nicklas, R. B., Ward, S. C., & Gorbsky, G. J. (1995). Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. The Journal of cell biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.130.4.929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.