The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Translational Diffusion of Macromolecule-sized Solutes in Cytoplasm and Nucleus
Open accessAbstract
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) was used to quantify the translational diffusion of microinjected FITC-dextrans and Ficolls in the cytoplasm and nucleus of MDCK epithelial cells and Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. Absolute diffusion coefficients (D) were measured using a microsecond-resolution FRAP apparatus and solution standards. In aqueous media (viscosity 1 cP), D for the FITC-dextrans decreased from 75 to 8.4 × 10−7 cm2/s with increasing dextran size (4–2,000 kD). D in cytoplasm relative to that in water (D/Do) was 0.26 ± 0.01 (MDCK) and 0.27 ± 0.01 (fibroblasts), and independent of FITC-dextran and Ficoll size (gyration radii [RG] 40–300 Å). The fraction of mobile FITC-dextran molecules (fmob), determined by the extent of fluorescence recovery after spot photobleaching, was >0.75 for RG < 200 Å, but decreased to <0.5 for RG > 300 Å. The independence of D/Do on FITC-dextran and Ficoll size does not support the concept of solute “sieving” (size-dependent diffusion) in cytoplasm. Photobleaching measurements using different spot diameters (1.5–4 μm) gave similar D/Do, indicating that microcompartments, if present, are of submicron size. Measurements of D/Do and fmob in concentrated dextran solutions, as well as in swollen and shrunken cells, suggested that the low fmob for very large macromolecules might be related to restrictions imposed by immobile obstacles (such as microcompartments) or to anomalous diffusion (such as percolation). In nucleus, D/Do was 0.25 ± 0.02 (MDCK) and 0.27 ± 0.03 (fibroblasts), and independent of solute size (RG 40–300 Å). Our results indicate relatively free and rapid diffusion of macromolecule-sized solutes up to approximately 500 kD in cytoplasm and nucleus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anomalous transport in the crowded world of biological cells
Höfling, F., & Franosch, T. (2013) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/4/046602 · Cited by 1,247
High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus
Phair, R. D., & Misteli, T. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35007077 · Cited by 1,204
Macromolecular crowding: an important but neglected aspect of the intracellular environment
Ellis, R. J. (2001) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00172-x · Cited by 1,153
Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3: intricacy of writing and reading a single epigenetic mark
Ruthenburg, A. J., Allis, C. D., & Wysocka, J. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.014 · Cited by 1,147
Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts
Stewart, M. P., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678 · Cited by 747
Metadata
- Authors
- Seksek, O., Biwersi, J., & Verkman, A. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1997-07-14
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-142
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2128341772
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translational Diffusion of Macromolecule-sized Solutes in Cytoplasm and Nucleus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.138.1.131
- The paper
- Seksek, O., Biwersi, J., & Verkman, A. S. (1997). Translational Diffusion of Macromolecule-sized Solutes in Cytoplasm and Nucleus. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.138.1.131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.