The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of the Modular Domains of SR Proteins in Subnuclear Localization and Alternative Splicing Specificity
Open accessAbstract
SR proteins are required for constitutive pre-mRNA splicing and also regulate alternative splice site selection in a concentration-dependent manner. They have a modular structure that consists of one or two RNA-recognition motifs (RRMs) and a COOH-terminal arginine/serine-rich domain (RS domain). We have analyzed the role of the individual domains of these closely related proteins in cellular distribution, subnuclear localization, and regulation of alternative splicing in vivo. We observed striking differences in the localization signals present in several human SR proteins. In contrast to earlier studies of RS domains in the Drosophila suppressor-of-white-apricot (SWAP) and Transformer (Tra) alternative splicing factors, we found that the RS domain of SF2/ASF is neither necessary nor sufficient for targeting to the nuclear speckles. Although this RS domain is a nuclear localization signal, subnuclear targeting to the speckles requires at least two of the three constituent domains of SF2/ASF, which contain additive and redundant signals. In contrast, in two SR proteins that have a single RRM (SC35 and SRp20), the RS domain is both necessary and sufficient as a targeting signal to the speckles. We also show that RRM2 of SF2/ASF plays an important role in alternative splicing specificity: deletion of this domain results in a protein that, although active in alternative splicing, has altered specificity in 5′ splice site selection. These results demonstrate the modularity of SR proteins and the importance of individual domains for their cellular localization and alternative splicing function in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems
Edelman, G. M., & Gally, J. A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.231499798 · Cited by 1,493
High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus
Phair, R. D., & Misteli, T. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35007077 · Cited by 1,204
Self-citationNucleocytoplasmic transport: the soluble phase
Mattaj, I. W., & Englmeier, L. (1998) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.265 · Cited by 1,175
Spector, D. L., & Lamond, A. I. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000646 · Cited by 819
Self-citationCeramide in apoptosis: an overview and current perspectives
Pettus, B. J., Chalfant, C. E., & Hannun, Y. A. (2002) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/s1388-1981(02)00331-1 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Cáceres, J. F., Misteli, T., Screaton, G. R., Spector, D. L., & Krainer, A. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1997-07-28
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-238
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2105234784
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of the Modular Domains of SR Proteins in Subnuclear Localization and Alternative Splicing Specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.138.2.225
- The paper
- Cáceres, J. F., Misteli, T., Screaton, G. R., Spector, D. L., & Krainer, A. R. (1997). Role of the Modular Domains of SR Proteins in Subnuclear Localization and Alternative Splicing Specificity. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.138.2.225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.