Cited by 226Cellular transport and secretionEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseHeat shock proteins research

Retrograde transport of Golgi-localized proteins to the ER

Open access
Cole, Nelson B., Ellenberg, Jan, Song, Jia, DiEuliis, Diane, Lippincott-Schwartz, Jennifer·1998·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

The ER is uniquely enriched in chaperones and folding enzymes that facilitate folding and unfolding reactions and ensure that only correctly folded and assembled proteins leave this compartment. Here we address the extent to which proteins that leave the ER and localize to distal sites in the secretory pathway are able to return to the ER folding environment during their lifetime. Retrieval of proteins back to the ER was studied using an assay based on the capacity of the ER to retain misfolded proteins. The lumenal domain of the temperature-sensitive viral glycoprotein VSVGtsO45 was fused to Golgi or plasma membrane targeting domains. At the nonpermissive temperature, newly synthesized fusion proteins misfolded and were retained in the ER, indicating the VSVGtsO45 ectodomain was sufficient for their retention within the ER. At the permissive temperature, the fusion proteins were correctly delivered to the Golgi complex or plasma membrane, indicating the lumenal epitope of VSVGtsO45 also did not interfere with proper targeting of these molecules. Strikingly, Golgi-localized fusion proteins, but not VSVGtsO45 itself, were found to redistribute back to the ER upon a shift to the nonpermissive temperature, where they misfolded and were retained. This occurred over a time period of 15 min-2 h depending on the chimera, and did not require new protein synthesis. Significantly, recycling did not appear to be induced by misfolding of the chimeras within the Golgi complex. This suggested these proteins normally cycle between the Golgi and ER, and while passing through the ER at 40 degrees C become misfolded and retained. The attachment of the thermosensitive VSVGtsO45 lumenal domain to proteins promises to be a useful tool for studying the molecular mechanisms and specificity of retrograde traffic to the ER.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.140.1.1

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inhibition of the vacuolar-type H+-ATPase by concanamycin blocks the plus-end-directed transport of Golgi enzymes into the peripheral ER.

    “In support of such a hypothesis, inhibition of the vacuolar-type H+-ATPase by concanamycin blocks the plus-end–directed transport of Golgi enzymes into the peripheral ER (Cole et al., 1998).”

    From Light Chain– dependent Regulation of Kinesin's Interaction with Microtubules (1998) · cites this paper as Cole et al., 1998

    The Results section (Kinetics and Properties of Retrograde Transport; page not provided) reports that concanamycin B, a vacuolar proton-ATPase inhibitor, prevented a Golgi-localized VSVG–TGN38 fusion protein from redistributing into the ER. It does not establish that the blocked transport was plus-end-directed or demonstrate that concanamycin blocked transport of Golgi enzymes specifically into the peripheral ER. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cole, N. B., Ellenberg, J., Song, J., DiEuliis, D., & Lippincott-Schwartz, J.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • *Cell Biology and Metabolism Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; and ‡National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
1998-01-12
Volume
140
Issue
1
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2113736802
Cited by
226
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
retrograde transport, endoplasmic reticulum retention, protein misfolding, protein recycling, secretory pathway, protein folding, fusion protein, lumenal domain
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Cycloheximide, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Golgi Apparatus, Cricetinae, Membrane Glycoproteins, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Simian virus 40, Temperature, Transfection, Viral Envelope Proteins, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, CHO Cells, Protein Folding, Receptors, Peptide, COS Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review