The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors
Open accessAbstract
The transition of cell–matrix adhesions from the initial punctate focal complexes into the mature elongated form, known as focal contacts, requires GTPase Rho activity. In particular, activation of myosin II–driven contractility by a Rho target known as Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) was shown to be essential for focal contact formation. To dissect the mechanism of Rho-dependent induction of focal contacts and to elucidate the role of cell contractility, we applied mechanical force to vinculin-containing dot-like adhesions at the cell edge using a micropipette. Local centripetal pulling led to local assembly and elongation of these structures and to their development into streak-like focal contacts, as revealed by the dynamics of green fluorescent protein–tagged vinculin or paxillin and interference reflection microscopy. Inhibition of Rho activity by C3 transferase suppressed this force-induced focal contact formation. However, constitutively active mutants of another Rho target, the formin homology protein mDia1 (Watanabe, N., T. Kato, A. Fujita, T. Ishizaki, and S. Narumiya. 1999. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:136–143), were sufficient to restore force-induced focal contact formation in C3 transferase-treated cells. Force-induced formation of the focal contacts still occurred in cells subjected to myosin II and ROCK inhibition. Thus, as long as mDia1 is active, external tension force bypasses the requirement for ROCK-mediated myosin II contractility in the induction of focal contacts. Our experiments show that integrin-containing focal complexes behave as individual mechanosensors exhibiting directional assembly in response to local force.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cell Movement Is Guided by the Rigidity of the Substrate
Lo, C.-M., Wang, H.-B., Dembo, M., & Wang, Y.-L. (2000) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76279-5 · Cited by 3,289
Cited by
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype
Paszek, M. J., Zahir, N., Johnson, K. R., Lakins, J. N., Rozenberg, G. I., Gefen, A., Reinhart-King, C. A., Margulies, S. S., Dembo, M., Boettiger, D., et al. (2005) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010 · Cited by 3,941
Environmental sensing through focal adhesions
Geiger, B., Spatz, J. P., & Bershadsky, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2593 · Cited by 2,543
Self-citationLocal force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions
Vogel, V., & Sheetz, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1890 · Cited by 2,328
Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again
Ingber, D. E. (2006) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.05-5424rev · Cited by 1,627
Metadata
- Authors
- Riveline, D., Zamir, E., Balaban, N. Q., Schwarz, U. S., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S., Kam, Z., Geiger, B., & Bershadsky, A. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2001-06-04
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1175-1186
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2141075109
- Cited by
- 1,419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.153.6.1175
- The paper
- Riveline, D., Zamir, E., Balaban, N. Q., Schwarz, U. S., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S., Kam, Z., Geiger, B., & Bershadsky, A. D. (2001). Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.153.6.1175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.