The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS
Open accessAbstract
An optical technique for measuring the thickness of thin films has been adapted and evaluated for studying the structure of the adhesion of cells to glass in tissue culture. This technique, which is termed interference reflection microscopy, has been used to study embryonic chick heart fibroblasts. These findings have been observed: in normal culture medium the closest approach of the cell surface to substrate in its adhesions is ca. 100 A, much of the cell surface lying farther away; chemical treatments which bring the cell surface to near its charge reversal point reduce the closest approach of adhesions to <50 A, probably to <30 A; chemical treatments which increase surface charge increase the nearest approach of cell and substrate in adhesions from ca. 100 A; high osmotic concentration of a non-polar substance, i.e. sucrose, does not affect the distance between cell and substrate in the adhesions. In addition, optical evidence indicates that there is no extracellular material between cell and glass in the adhesions. When cells de-adhere from glass, they appear not to leave fragments behind. The adhesive sites in these fibroblasts appear to be confined to the edge of the side of the cell facing the substrate and to the pseudopods. The significance of this is discussed in relation to the phenomenon of contact inhibition. Evidence is presented that the mechanism of cell adhesion does not involve calcium atoms binding cells to substrate by combining with carboxyl groups on cell surface, substrate, and with a cement substance. Osmium tetroxide fixation results in a final separation of 100 to 200 A between cell and substrate: there are reasons for thinking that this fairly close approach to the condition in life is produced as an artefact. The results can be accounted for only in terms of the action of electrostatic repulsive forces and an attractive force, probably the van der Waals—London forces. Biological arguments suggest that these results are equally applicable for cell-to-cell adhesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Appreciating force and shape—the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology
Iskratsch, T., Wolfenson, H., & Sheetz, M. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3903 · Cited by 798
Abercrombie, M., & Dunn, G. A. (1975) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/0014-4827(75)90636-9 · Cited by 324
Skeletal muscle tissue engineering: methods to form skeletal myotubes and their applications
Ostrovidov, S., Hosseini, V., Ahadian, S., Fujie, T., Parthiban, S. P., Ramalingam, M., Bae, H., Kaji, H., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0534 · Cited by 302
The Croonian Lecture, 1978 - The crawling movement of metazoan cells
Abercrombie, M. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0017 · Cited by 261
Amyloid Precursor Protein Is an Autonomous Growth Cone Adhesion Molecule Engaged in Contact Guidance
Sosa, L. J., Bergman, J., Estrada-Bernal, A., Glorioso, T. J., Kittelson, J. M., & Pfenninger, K. H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064521 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Curtis, A. S. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 1964-02-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-215
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2011182428
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1083/jcb.20.2.199
- The paper
- Curtis, A. S. G. (1964). THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS. The Journal of Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.20.2.199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.