The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A protein interaction map for cell polarity development
Open accessAbstract
Many genes required for cell polarity development in budding yeast have been identified and arranged into a functional hierarchy. Core elements of the hierarchy are widely conserved, underlying cell polarity development in diverse eukaryotes. To enumerate more fully the protein–protein interactions that mediate cell polarity development, and to uncover novel mechanisms that coordinate the numerous events involved, we carried out a large-scale two-hybrid experiment. 68 Gal4 DNA binding domain fusions of yeast proteins associated with the actin cytoskeleton, septins, the secretory apparatus, and Rho-type GTPases were used to screen an array of yeast transformants that express ∼90% of the predicted Saccharomyces cerevisiae open reading frames as Gal4 activation domain fusions. 191 protein–protein interactions were detected, of which 128 had not been described previously. 44 interactions implicated 20 previously uncharacterized proteins in cell polarity development. Further insights into possible roles of 13 of these proteins were revealed by their multiple two-hybrid interactions and by subcellular localization. Included in the interaction network were associations of Cdc42 and Rho1 pathways with proteins involved in exocytosis, septin organization, actin assembly, microtubule organization, autophagy, cytokinesis, and cell wall synthesis. Other interactions suggested direct connections between Rho1- and Cdc42-regulated pathways; the secretory apparatus and regulators of polarity establishment; actin assembly and the morphogenesis checkpoint; and the exocytic and endocytic machinery. In total, a network of interactions that provide an integrated response of signaling proteins, the cytoskeleton, and organelles to the spatial cues that direct polarity development was revealed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Self-citationTor-Mediated Induction of Autophagy via an Apg1 Protein Kinase Complex
Kamada, Y., Funakoshi, T., Shintani, T., Nagano, K., Ohsumi, M., & Ohsumi, Y. (2000) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507 · Cited by 1,145
Foster, L. J., Yeung, B., Mohtashami, M., Ross, K., Trimble, W. S., & Klip, A. (1998) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi980253t · Cited by 134
Cited by
Actin Assembly and Endocytosis: From Yeast to Mammals
Engqvist-Goldstein, Å. E. Y., & Drubin, D. G. (2003) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111401.093127 · Cited by 572
Self-citationReggiori, F., Tucker, K. A., Stromhaug, P. E., & Klionsky, D. J. (2004) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00402-7 · Cited by 476
Atg17 Functions in Cooperation with Atg1 and Atg13 in Yeast Autophagy
Kabeya, Y., Kamada, Y., Baba, M., Takikawa, H., Sasaki, M., & Ohsumi, Y. (2005) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e04-08-0669 · Cited by 304
p62 and NDP52 Proteins Target Intracytosolic Shigella and Listeria to Different Autophagy Pathways
Mostowy, S., Sancho-Shimizu, V., Hamon, M. A., Simeone, R., Brosch, R., Johansen, T., & Cossart, P. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.223610 · Cited by 294
Reggiori, F., Monastyrska, I., Shintani, T., & Klionsky, D. J. (2005) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e05-07-0629 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Drees, B. L., Sundin, B., Brazeau, E., Caviston, J. P., Chen, G.-C., Guo, W., Kozminski, K. G., Lau, M. W., Moskow, J. J., Tong, A., Schenkman, L. R., McKenzie, A., Brennwald, P., Longtine, M., Bi, E., Chan, C., Novick, P., Boone, C., Pringle, J. R., Davis, T. N., Fields, S., & Drubin, D. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2001-08-06
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 549-576
- ISSN
- 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8140
- OpenAlex
- W2160042914
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.