Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Integrins control motile strategy through a Rho–cofilin pathway

Danen, Erik H.J., van Rheenen, Jacco, Franken, Willeke, Huveneers, Stephan, Sonneveld, Petra, Jalink, Kees, Sonnenberg, Arnoud·2005·The Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

During wound healing, angiogenesis, and tumor invasion, cells often change their expression profiles of fibronectin-binding integrins. Here, we show that β1 integrins promote random migration, whereas β3 integrins promote persistent migration in the same epithelial cell background. Adhesion to fibronectin by αvβ3 supports extensive actin cytoskeletal reorganization through the actin-severing protein cofilin, resulting in a single broad lamellipod with static cell–matrix adhesions at the leading edge. Adhesion by α5β1 instead leads to the phosphorylation/inactivation of cofilin, and these cells fail to polarize their cytoskeleton but extend thin protrusions containing highly dynamic cell–matrix adhesions in multiple directions. The activity of the small GTPase RhoA is particularly high in cells adhering by α5β1, and inhibition of Rho signaling causes a switch from a β1- to a β3-associated mode of migration, whereas increased Rho activity has the opposite effect. Thus, alterations in integrin expression profiles allow cells to modulate several critical aspects of the motile machinery through Rho GTPases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200412081

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 17582, 10.1074/jbc.270.29.17582 · DOI
  2. 1999, J. Cell Biol., 144, 1019, 10.1083/jcb.144.5.1019 · DOI
  3. 1998, Nature., 393, 805, 10.1038/31729 · DOI
  4. 2002, Biol. Res., 35, 239
  5. 2001, J. Cell Biol., 155, 1319, 10.1083/jcb.200107107 · DOI
  6. 1999, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 15, 185, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.185 · DOI
  7. 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 5264, 10.1074/jbc.M206997200 · DOI
  8. 2002, J. Cell Biol., 156, 725, 10.1083/jcb.200111032 · DOI
  9. 2000, J. Cell Biol., 151, 1413, 10.1083/jcb.151.7.1413 · DOI
  10. 2002, J. Cell Biol., 159, 1071, 10.1083/jcb.200205014 · DOI
  11. 2003, Curr. Biol., 13, 252, 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00040-X · DOI
  12. 2000, EMBO J., 19, 2008, 10.1093/emboj/19.9.2008 · DOI
  13. 2004, J. Cell Sci., 117, 3499, 10.1242/jcs.01211 · DOI
  14. 1999, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, 253, 10.1038/12963 · DOI
  15. 2002, Nature., 420, 629, 10.1038/nature01148 · DOI
  16. 1998, EMBO J., 17, 81, 10.1093/emboj/17.1.81 · DOI
  17. 2004, Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 977, 10.1038/ncb1175 · DOI
  18. 2001, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2, 793, 10.1038/35099066 · DOI
  19. 2004, Science., 304, 743, 10.1126/science.1094561 · DOI
  20. 1999, J. Cell Biol., 147, 1325, 10.1083/jcb.147.6.1325 · DOI
  21. 1981, J. Cell Biol., 91, 589, 10.1083/jcb.91.2.589 · DOI
  22. 1995, Nature., 377, 539, 10.1038/377539a0 · DOI
  23. 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 316, 10.1038/35060120 · DOI
  24. 1999, Science., 285, 895, 10.1126/science.285.5429.895 · DOI
  25. 2002, J. Cell Sci., 115, 2199, 10.1242/jcs.115.10.2199 · DOI
  26. 1999, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 222, 124, 10.1046/j.1525-1373.1999.d01-122.x · DOI
  27. 1996, Genes Cells., 1, 73, 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.05005.x · DOI
  28. 2004, J. Cell Biol., 166, 697, 10.1083/jcb.200405156 · DOI
  29. 2002, Cell., 108, 233, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00638-9 · DOI
  30. 2002, J. Cell Sci., 115, 3861, 10.1242/jcs.00059 · DOI
  31. 2003, Cell., 112, 453, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00120-X · DOI
  32. 1998, Mol. Biol. Cell., 9, 1863, 10.1091/mbc.9.7.1863 · DOI
  33. 2003, Dev. Cell., 5, 415, 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00261-2 · DOI
  34. 1999, EMBO J., 18, 578, 10.1093/emboj/18.3.578 · DOI
  35. 2003, Science., 302, 1704, 10.1126/science.1092053 · DOI
  36. 1999, Curr. Biol., 9, 640, 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80286-3 · DOI
  37. 2003, Nat. Cell Biol., 5, 711, 10.1038/ncb1019 · DOI
  38. 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 15480, 10.1074/jbc.274.22.15480 · DOI
  39. 1984, J. Cell Biol., 99, 1045, 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1045 · DOI
  40. 2003, Cancer Cell., 4, 67, 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00162-4 · DOI
  41. 2002, EMBO J., 21, 3919, 10.1093/emboj/cdf399 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2004, Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 154, 10.1038/ncb1094 · DOI
  43. 2003, J. Cell Biol., 160, 267, 10.1083/jcb.200209006 · DOI
  44. 1998, Nature., 393, 809, 10.1038/31735 · DOI
  45. 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 21125, 10.1074/jbc.273.33.21125 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Danen, E. H. J., van Rheenen, J., Franken, W., Huveneers, S., Sonneveld, P., Jalink, K., & Sonnenberg, A.
Affiliations
Division of Cell Biology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2005-05-02
Volume
169
Issue
3
Pages
515-526
ISSN
  • 1540-8140
  • 0021-9525
Cited by
185
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review