The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrins control motile strategy through a Rho–cofilin pathway
Abstract
During wound healing, angiogenesis, and tumor invasion, cells often change their expression profiles of fibronectin-binding integrins. Here, we show that β1 integrins promote random migration, whereas β3 integrins promote persistent migration in the same epithelial cell background. Adhesion to fibronectin by αvβ3 supports extensive actin cytoskeletal reorganization through the actin-severing protein cofilin, resulting in a single broad lamellipod with static cell–matrix adhesions at the leading edge. Adhesion by α5β1 instead leads to the phosphorylation/inactivation of cofilin, and these cells fail to polarize their cytoskeleton but extend thin protrusions containing highly dynamic cell–matrix adhesions in multiple directions. The activity of the small GTPase RhoA is particularly high in cells adhering by α5β1, and inhibition of Rho signaling causes a switch from a β1- to a β3-associated mode of migration, whereas increased Rho activity has the opposite effect. Thus, alterations in integrin expression profiles allow cells to modulate several critical aspects of the motile machinery through Rho GTPases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The downregulation of fibronectin might be explained by it being a ligand for integrin αV/β3.
“Fibronectin is a ligand for integrin αV/β3,36 which might explain its downregulation (19.6–39.8 fold) in gp96 deficient cells.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 17582, 10.1074/jbc.270.29.17582 · DOI
- 1999, J. Cell Biol., 144, 1019, 10.1083/jcb.144.5.1019 · DOI
- 1998, Nature., 393, 805, 10.1038/31729 · DOI
- 2002, Biol. Res., 35, 239
- 2001, J. Cell Biol., 155, 1319, 10.1083/jcb.200107107 · DOI
- 1999, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 15, 185, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.185 · DOI
- 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 5264, 10.1074/jbc.M206997200 · DOI
- 2002, J. Cell Biol., 156, 725, 10.1083/jcb.200111032 · DOI
- 2000, J. Cell Biol., 151, 1413, 10.1083/jcb.151.7.1413 · DOI
- 2002, J. Cell Biol., 159, 1071, 10.1083/jcb.200205014 · DOI
- 2003, Curr. Biol., 13, 252, 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00040-X · DOI
- 2000, EMBO J., 19, 2008, 10.1093/emboj/19.9.2008 · DOI
- 2004, J. Cell Sci., 117, 3499, 10.1242/jcs.01211 · DOI
- 1999, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, 253, 10.1038/12963 · DOI
- 2002, Nature., 420, 629, 10.1038/nature01148 · DOI
- 1998, EMBO J., 17, 81, 10.1093/emboj/17.1.81 · DOI
- 2004, Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 977, 10.1038/ncb1175 · DOI
- 2001, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2, 793, 10.1038/35099066 · DOI
- 2004, Science., 304, 743, 10.1126/science.1094561 · DOI
- 1999, J. Cell Biol., 147, 1325, 10.1083/jcb.147.6.1325 · DOI
- 1981, J. Cell Biol., 91, 589, 10.1083/jcb.91.2.589 · DOI
- 1995, Nature., 377, 539, 10.1038/377539a0 · DOI
- 2001, Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 316, 10.1038/35060120 · DOI
- 1999, Science., 285, 895, 10.1126/science.285.5429.895 · DOI
- 2002, J. Cell Sci., 115, 2199, 10.1242/jcs.115.10.2199 · DOI
- 1999, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 222, 124, 10.1046/j.1525-1373.1999.d01-122.x · DOI
- 1996, Genes Cells., 1, 73, 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.05005.x · DOI
- 2004, J. Cell Biol., 166, 697, 10.1083/jcb.200405156 · DOI
- 2002, Cell., 108, 233, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00638-9 · DOI
- 2002, J. Cell Sci., 115, 3861, 10.1242/jcs.00059 · DOI
- 2003, Cell., 112, 453, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00120-X · DOI
- 1998, Mol. Biol. Cell., 9, 1863, 10.1091/mbc.9.7.1863 · DOI
- 2003, Dev. Cell., 5, 415, 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00261-2 · DOI
- 1999, EMBO J., 18, 578, 10.1093/emboj/18.3.578 · DOI
- 2003, Science., 302, 1704, 10.1126/science.1092053 · DOI
- 1999, Curr. Biol., 9, 640, 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)80286-3 · DOI
- 2003, Nat. Cell Biol., 5, 711, 10.1038/ncb1019 · DOI
- 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 15480, 10.1074/jbc.274.22.15480 · DOI
- 1984, J. Cell Biol., 99, 1045, 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1045 · DOI
- 2003, Cancer Cell., 4, 67, 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00162-4 · DOI
- 2002, EMBO J., 21, 3919, 10.1093/emboj/cdf399 · DOI · Paper page
- 2004, Nat. Cell Biol., 6, 154, 10.1038/ncb1094 · DOI
- 2003, J. Cell Biol., 160, 267, 10.1083/jcb.200209006 · DOI
- 1998, Nature., 393, 809, 10.1038/31735 · DOI
- 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 21125, 10.1074/jbc.273.33.21125 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental sensing through focal adhesions
Geiger, B., Spatz, J. P., & Bershadsky, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2593 · Cited by 2,543
Gaggioli, C., Hooper, S., Hidalgo-Carcedo, C., Grosse, R., Marshall, J. F., Harrington, K., & Sahai, E. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1658 · Cited by 1,589
Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Build and Secure the Tumor Microenvironment
Liu, T., Zhou, L., Li, D., Andl, T., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2019.00060 · Cited by 446
Endocytosis and signaling: Cell logistics shape the eukaryotic cell plan
Sigismund, S., Confalonieri, S., Ciliberto, A., Polo, S., Scita, G., & Di Fiore, P. P. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00005.2011 · Cited by 338
Weekes, M. P., Antrobus, R., Talbot, S., Hör, S., Simecek, N., Smith, D. L., Bloor, S., Randow, F., & Lehner, P. J. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr201135e · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Danen, E. H. J., van Rheenen, J., Franken, W., Huveneers, S., Sonneveld, P., Jalink, K., & Sonnenberg, A.
- Affiliations
- Division of Cell Biology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Venue
- The Journal of Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Rockefeller University Press
- Published
- 2005-05-02
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 515-526
- ISSN
- 1540-8140
- 0021-9525
- PMC
- PMC2171933
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review