Cited by 53Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCellular transport and secretionLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

Parallel phospholipid transfer by Vps13 and Atg2 determines autophagosome biogenesis dynamics

Open access
Dabrowski, Rahel, Tulli, Susanna, Graef, Martin·2023·Journal of Cell Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

During autophagy, rapid membrane assembly expands small phagophores into large double-membrane autophagosomes. Theoretical modeling predicts that the majority of autophagosomal phospholipids are derived from highly efficient non-vesicular phospholipid transfer (PLT) across phagophore–ER contacts (PERCS). Currently, the phagophore–ER tether Atg2 is the only PLT protein known to drive phagophore expansion in vivo. Here, our quantitative live-cell imaging analysis reveals a poor correlation between the duration and size of forming autophagosomes and the number of Atg2 molecules at PERCS of starving yeast cells. Strikingly, we find that Atg2-mediated PLT is non-rate limiting for autophagosome biogenesis because membrane tether and the PLT protein Vps13 localizes to the rim and promotes the expansion of phagophores in parallel with Atg2. In the absence of Vps13, the number of Atg2 molecules at PERCS determines the duration and size of forming autophagosomes with an apparent in vivo transfer rate of ∼200 phospholipids per Atg2 molecule and second. We propose that conserved PLT proteins cooperate in channeling phospholipids across organelle contact sites for non-rate-limiting membrane assembly during autophagosome biogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.202211039

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dabrowski, R., Tulli, S., & Graef, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing (DE)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Graef, Martin
Venue
Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2023-04-28
Volume
222
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W4367299372
Cited by
53
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Max Planck Society
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1218)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
autophagosome formation, phospholipid transfer, Vps13, ATG2, membrane tethering, autophagy, yeast, membrane assembly, membrane contact sites
MeSH terms
Autophagosomes, Autophagy-Related Proteins, Autophagy, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Phospholipids, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review